Literature DB >> 31452645

Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.

Kevin L Knudtson1, Robert H Carnahan2, Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies3, Nancy C Fisher4, Belynda Hicks5, Peter A Lopez6, Susan M Meyn2, Sheenah M Mische6, Frances Weis-Garcia7, Lisa D White8, Katia Sol-Church9.   

Abstract

Shared scientific resources, also known as core facilities, support a significant portion of the research conducted at biomolecular research institutions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) established the Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CCoRRe) to further its mission of integrating advanced technologies, education, and communication in the operations of shared scientific resources in support of reproducible research. In order to first assess the needs of the scientific shared resource community, the CCoRRe solicited feedback from ABRF members via a survey. The purpose of the survey was to gain information on how U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives on advancing scientific rigor and reproducibility influenced current services and new technology development. In addition, the survey aimed to identify the challenges and opportunities related to implementation of new reporting requirements and to identify new practices and resources needed to ensure rigorous research. The results revealed a surprising unfamiliarity with the NIH guidelines. Many of the perceived challenges to the effective implementation of best practices (i.e., those designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility) were similarly noted as a challenge to effective provision of support services in a core setting. Further, most cores routinely use best practices and offer services that support rigor and reproducibility. These services include access to well-maintained instrumentation and training on experimental design and data analysis as well as data management. Feedback from this survey will enable the ABRF to build better educational resources and share critical best-practice guidelines. These resources will become important tools to the core community and the researchers they serve to impact rigor and transparency across the range of science and technology.

Keywords:  core; reproducibility; rigor; shared resource; transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31452645      PMCID: PMC6657953          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  10 in total

1.  Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Alastair M Buchan; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sharing Core Facilities and Research Resources--An Investment in Accelerating Scientific Discoveries.

Authors:  Michael Chang; Franziska B Grieder
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 3.  Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Reality check on reproducibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.

Authors:  B A Nosek; G Alter; G C Banks; D Borsboom; S D Bowman; S J Breckler; S Buck; C D Chambers; G Chin; G Christensen; M Contestabile; A Dafoe; E Eich; J Freese; R Glennerster; D Goroff; D P Green; B Hesse; M Humphreys; J Ishiyama; D Karlan; A Kraut; A Lupia; P Mabry; T A Madon; N Malhotra; E Mayo-Wilson; M McNutt; E Miguel; E Levy Paluck; U Simonsohn; C Soderberg; B A Spellman; J Turitto; G VandenBos; S Vazire; E J Wagenmakers; R Wilson; T Yarkoni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.057

8.  The increasing urgency for standards in basic biologic research.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; James Inglese
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The reproducibility of biomedical research: Sleepers awake!

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2015-01-21

Review 10.  Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; Gautham Venugopalan; Rosann Wisman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-05-02
  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study.

Authors:  Christopher W Gregory
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-07

Review 2.  A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.

Authors:  Sheenah M Mische; Nancy C Fisher; Susan M Meyn; Katia Sol-Church; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Frances Weis-Garcia; Marie Adams; John M Ashton; Kym M Delventhal; Julie A Dragon; Laura Holmes; Pratik Jagtap; Kristopher E Kubow; Christopher E Mason; Magnus Palmblad; Brian C Searle; Christoph W Turck; Kevin L Knudtson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-04

3.  The Shared Core Resource as a Partner in Innovative Scientific Research: Illustration from an Academic Microscopy Imaging Center.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Prachi N Ghule; Nicole A Bouffard; Kyra Lee; Nicole M DeLance; Mark F Evans; Donald L Weaver; Nicholas Deakin; Frances E Carr; Brian L Sprague; Gary S Stein; Janet L Stein
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2022-03-24

4.  A survey of research quality in core facilities.

Authors:  Isabelle C Kos-Braun; Björn Gerlach; Claudia Pitzer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Understanding experiments and research practices for reproducibility: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Sheeba Samuel; Birgitta König-Ries
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Towards best practices in research: Role of academic core facilities.

Authors:  Leonardo Restivo; Björn Gerlach; Michael Tsoory; Lior Bikovski; Sylvia Badurek; Claudia Pitzer; Isabelle C Kos-Braun; Anne-Laure Mj Mausset-Bonnefont; Jonathan Ward; Michael Schunn; Lucas Pjj Noldus; Anton Bespalov; Vootele Voikar
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 8.807

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.