Literature DB >> 25552691

Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.

C Glenn Begley1, John P A Ioannidis2.   

Abstract

Medical and scientific advances are predicated on new knowledge that is robust and reliable and that serves as a solid foundation on which further advances can be built. In biomedical research, we are in the midst of a revolution with the generation of new data and scientific publications at a previously unprecedented rate. However, unfortunately, there is compelling evidence that the majority of these discoveries will not stand the test of time. To a large extent, this reproducibility crisis in basic and preclinical research may be as a result of failure to adhere to good scientific practice and the desperation to publish or perish. This is a multifaceted, multistakeholder problem. No single party is solely responsible, and no single solution will suffice. Here we review the reproducibility problems in basic and preclinical biomedical research, highlight some of the complexities, and discuss potential solutions that may help improve research quality and reproducibility.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Keywords:  funding; journals; research integrity; universities

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25552691     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  248 in total

1.  Adding the Team into T1 Translational Research: A Case Study of Multidisciplinary Team Science in the Evaluation of Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer Risk and Prognosis.

Authors:  Michael T Marrone; Corinne E Joshu; Sarah B Peskoe; Angelo M De Marzo; Christopher M Heaphy; Shawn E Lupold; Alan K Meeker; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Day; Glenn Merlino; Terry Van Dyke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Kevin L Knudtson; Robert H Carnahan; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Nancy C Fisher; Belynda Hicks; Peter A Lopez; Susan M Meyn; Sheenah M Mische; Frances Weis-Garcia; Lisa D White; Katia Sol-Church
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2019-09

4.  Data Curation for Preclinical and Clinical Multimodal Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Grace Gyamfuah Yamoah; Liji Cao; Chao Wu Wu; Freek J Beekman; Bert Vandeghinste; Julia G Mannheim; Stefanie Rosenhain; Kevin Leonardic; Fabian Kiessling; Felix Gremse
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Reproducible pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Academia and industry: allocating credit for discovery and development of new therapies.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Flier
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Sex and rigor: the TGF-β blood pressure affair.

Authors:  Kathryn Sandberg; Amrita V Pai; Taylor Maddox
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09

Review 8.  Bench-to-Bedside: A Translational Perspective on Murine Models of Sepsis.

Authors:  Anthony J Lewis; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  ATAC-ing the mechanisms of renin regulation.

Authors:  Steven D Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  LV-MEMS: A New Challenger Against the CHAMPION?

Authors:  Kiyotake Ishikawa
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.