Literature DB >> 31969795

A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.

Sheenah M Mische1, Nancy C Fisher2, Susan M Meyn3, Katia Sol-Church4, Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies5, Frances Weis-Garcia6, Marie Adams7, John M Ashton8, Kym M Delventhal9, Julie A Dragon10, Laura Holmes9, Pratik Jagtap5, Kristopher E Kubow11, Christopher E Mason12, Magnus Palmblad13, Brian C Searle14, Christoph W Turck15, Kevin L Knudtson16.   

Abstract

Shared research resource facilities, also known as core laboratories (Cores), are responsible for generating a significant and growing portion of the research data in academic biomedical research institutions. Cores represent a central repository for institutional knowledge management, with deep expertise in the strengths and limitations of technology and its applications. They inherently support transparency and scientific reproducibility by protecting against cognitive bias in research design and data analysis, and they have institutional responsibility for the conduct of research (research ethics, regulatory compliance, and financial accountability) performed in their Cores. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) is a FASEB-member scientific society whose members are scientists and administrators that manage or support Cores. The ABRF Research Groups (RGs), representing expertise for an array of cutting-edge and established technology platforms, perform multicenter research studies to determine and communicate best practices and community-based standards. This review provides a summary of the contributions of the ABRF RGs to promote scientific rigor and reproducibility in Cores from the published literature, ABRF meetings, and ABRF RGs communications. © Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.

Keywords:  collaborative research; community based standards; core laboratories; multicenter research studies; shared resource

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31969795      PMCID: PMC6959150          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  94 in total

1.  Core facilities: maximizing the return on investment.

Authors:  Gregory K Farber; Linda Weiss
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Research Group 2006 study: relative protein quantitation.

Authors:  Christoph W Turck; Arnold M Falick; Jeffrey A Kowalak; William S Lane; Kathryn S Lilley; Brett S Phinney; Susan T Weintraub; H Ewa Witkowska; Nathan A Yates
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  ABRF-PRG04: differentiation of protein isoforms.

Authors:  David Arnott; Mary Ann Gawinowicz; Jeffrey A Kowalak; William S Lane; Kaye D Speicher; Christoph W Turck; Karen A West; Thomas A Neubert
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2007-04

4.  Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems.

Authors:  Robert F Stack; Carol J Bayles; Anne-Marie Girard; Karen Martin; Cynthia Opansky; Katherine Schulz; Richard W Cole
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.127

5.  Predicting tryptic cleavage from proteomics data using decision tree ensembles.

Authors:  Thomas Fannes; Elien Vandermarliere; Leander Schietgat; Sven Degroeve; Lennart Martens; Jan Ramon
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Sequencing of the Dutch elm disease fungus genome using the Roche/454 GS-FLX Titanium System in a comparison of multiple genomics core facilities.

Authors:  Vincenzo Forgetta; Gary Leveque; Joana Dias; Deborah Grove; Robert Lyons; Suzanne Genik; Chris Wright; Sushmita Singh; Nichole Peterson; Michael Zianni; Jan Kieleczawa; Robert Steen; Anoja Perera; Doug Bintzler; Scottie Adams; Will Hintz; Volker Jacobi; Louis Bernier; Roger Levesque; Ken Dewar
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-04

7.  ABRF ESRG 2005 study: identification of seven modified amino acids by Edman sequencing.

Authors:  D Brune; N D Denslow; R Kobayashi; W S Lane; J W Leone; B J Madden; J M Neveu; J Pohl
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2006-12

8.  Comparison of amino acid analyses by phenylisothiocyanate and 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate precolumn derivatization.

Authors:  D J Strydom; S A Cohen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  Single-molecule sequencing detection of N6-methyladenine in microbial reference materials.

Authors:  Alexa B R McIntyre; Noah Alexander; Kirill Grigorev; Daniela Bezdan; Heike Sichtig; Charles Y Chiu; Christopher E Mason
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The Metagenomics and Metadesign of the Subways and Urban Biomes (MetaSUB) International Consortium inaugural meeting report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 14.650

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reopening During the Unprecedented: The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Community Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Response. Part 2: Efforts to Effectively Ramp Up Core Facility Activities.

Authors:  Joshua Z Rappoport; DeLaine D Larsen; Benjamin Abrams; Andrew Vinard; Justine Kigenyi; Isabelle Girard; A Nicole White; Desiree M Porter; Sheenah M Mische
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 2.  Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods.

Authors:  Paula Montero Llopis; Rebecca A Senft; Tim J Ross-Elliott; Ryan Stephansky; Daniel P Keeley; Preman Koshar; Guillermo Marqués; Ya-Sheng Gao; Benjamin R Carlson; Thomas Pengo; Mark A Sanders; Lisa A Cameron; Michelle S Itano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.