Literature DB >> 32655325

Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study.

Christopher W Gregory1.   

Abstract

Core facilities are key resources supporting the academic research enterprise, providing access to innovative and essential technologies and expertise. Given the constraints placed on core facilities as recharge centers and the ever-changing research environment, an important competitive differentiator that can support rigorous and reproducible approaches in core labs is the implementation of a quality management system (QMS). This paper describes a systematic approach to building a QMS in a genomics core facility at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. This model is based on principles of the International Organization for Standardization 9001 system with initiatives focused on process mapping, training (communication, customer service, performance management, development of standard operating procedures, and quality audits), root cause analysis, visual control boards, mock quality audits, and continuous improvement through metrics tracking and "voice of the customer" exercises. The goal of this paper is to share practical step-by-step recommendations and outcomes of this core facility QMS that are generally applicable to academic core facilities, regardless of technical focus. Application of these good laboratory practice principles will foster "competitiveness through compliance" and promote outstanding interdisciplinary research between academic cores and their nonacademic pharmaceutical and federal research partners. Additionally, implementation of the QMS qualified this core to apply for federally funded contracts, thereby diversifying its types of projects and sources of revenue. © Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.

Keywords:  Six Sigma; good laboratory practice; process improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32655325      PMCID: PMC7266070          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.20-3102-004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  9 in total

1.  Institutional management of core facilities during challenging financial times.

Authors:  Rand Haley
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2011-12

2.  Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes.

Authors:  Paula B Turpen; Philip E Hockberger; Susan M Meyn; Connie Nicklin; Diane Tabarini; Julie A Auger
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2016-02-02

3.  U.S. National Institutes of Health core consolidation-investing in greater efficiency.

Authors:  Michael C Chang; Steven Birken; Franziska Grieder; James Anderson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-04

4.  Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Kevin L Knudtson; Robert H Carnahan; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Nancy C Fisher; Belynda Hicks; Peter A Lopez; Susan M Meyn; Sheenah M Mische; Frances Weis-Garcia; Lisa D White; Katia Sol-Church
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2019-09

5.  One step ahead: Innovation in core facilities.

Authors:  Saskia Lippens; Christophe D'Enfert; Lilla Farkas; Anna Kehres; Bernhard Korn; Mònica Morales; Rainer Pepperkok; Lavanya Premvardhan; Ralph Schlapbach; Andreas Tiran; Doris Meder; Geert Van Minnebruggen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  A brief guide to root cause analysis.

Authors:  Yael K Heher
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Framework for the quality assurance of 'omics technologies considering GLP requirements.

Authors:  Hans-Martin Kauffmann; Hennicke Kamp; Regine Fuchs; Brian N Chorley; Lize Deferme; Timothy Ebbels; Jörg Hackermüller; Stefania Perdichizzi; Alan Poole; Ursula G Sauer; Knut E Tollefsen; Tewes Tralau; Carole Yauk; Ben van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Institutional core facilities: prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences: Core facilities play an increasingly important role in biomedical research by providing scientists access to sophisticated technology and expertise.

Authors:  Doris Meder; Mònica Morales; Rainer Pepperkok; Ralph Schlapbach; Andreas Tiran; Geert Van Minnebruggen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 9.  Standardization and quality management in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Christoph Endrullat; Jörn Glökler; Philipp Franke; Marcus Frohme
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-07-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Quality Management Tools on the Stage: Old but New Allies for Rigor and Standardization of Extracellular Vesicle Studies.

Authors:  Giovanna L Liguori; Annamaria Kisslinger
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.