| Literature DB >> 31438621 |
Pulabala Ramesh1,2, Vankadari Srinivasa Rao2, Yi-An Hong3, P Muralidhar Reddy4.
Abstract
A series of 2-hydroxy-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives (3a-k) were designed, synthesized, and characterized for their structure determination by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS (ESI) spectral data. They were screened for their in vitro biological activities against a panel of selected bacterial and fungal strains. These antimicrobial studies indicate that some of the analogues manifested significant activity compared to standard drugs. Among the synthetic analogues (3a-k), compounds 3d, 3f, and 3j exhibited very good antibacterial activity and compounds 3d, 3f, and 3h showed very good antifungal activity compared to the standard drugs penicillin and itrazole, respectively. The compounds 3e, 3g, and 3h showed moderate antibacterial activity and the compounds 3j and 3k showed moderate antifungal activity. Molecular docking studies were performed and the experimental antimicrobial screening results were also correlated with the binding energy values obtained by molecular docking. The synthesized chrysin analogues (3a-k) have obeyed Lipinski's "rule of five" and have drug-likeness.Entities:
Keywords: biological activities; chrysin; dithiocarbamates; epoxide; molecular docking studies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31438621 PMCID: PMC6749404 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of novel 2-hydrox-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives 3a–k.
Synthesis of novel 2-hydroxy-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives 3a–k catalyzed by LiBr a.
| S.No | Entry | HNR1R2 | Product b | Yield c (%) | M.P (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Piperazine |
| 89 | 134–136 |
| 2 |
| Pyrrolidine |
| 88 | 144–146 |
| 3 |
| Morpholine |
| 88 | 146–148 |
| 4 |
| 4-Benzyl piperazine |
| 81 | 154–156 |
| 5 |
| Thiomorpholine |
| 82 | 168–170 |
| 6 |
| 4-Fluorophenyl piperazine |
| 74 | 146–148 |
| 7 |
| 4-Pyridyl piperazine |
| 68 | 152–154 |
| 8 |
| 4-Methoxyphenyl piperazine |
| 73 | 151–152 |
| 9 |
| Cis-3,5-Dimethyl morpholine |
| 71 | 181–183 |
| 10 |
| 4-Benzyloxy carbonyl piperazine |
| 66 | 140–142 |
| 11 |
| Diethyl amine |
| 85 | 158–160 |
a All the reactions were performed with CS2 (3 equiv), cyclic/secondary amines (1.5 equiv), and chrysin (1 equiv) catalyzed by LiBr (40 mol%). b All the products were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS-ESI spectroscopies. c Yields refer to isolated products (based on Epoxide 2).
Antimicrobial screening of the synthesized 2-hydroxy-3-hydroxy dithiocarbamate derivatives (3a–k).
| Zone of Inhibition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Fungi | ||||
| Compound Code |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 | 14 | 17 | 10 | 8 | 6 |
|
| 14 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 8 |
|
| 10 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 6 |
|
| 26 (9.37) | 30 (4.68) | 29 (4.68) | 23 (18.75) | 23 (18.75) | 21 (18.75) |
|
| 18 | 19 | 22 | 19 | 8 | 9 |
|
| 23 (18.75) | 26 (9.37) | 25 (9.37) | 21 (18.75) | 27 (9.37) | 21 (18.75) |
|
| 21 (18.75) | 18 (18.75) | 19 (9.37) | 20 (18.75) | 9 | 7 |
|
| 21 | 17 | 20 | 19 | 28 (4.68) | 26 (18.75) |
|
| 9 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
|
| 24 (9.37) | 23 (4.68) | 21 (9.37) | 20 (18.75) | 21 (18.75) | 19 (37.5) |
|
| 7 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 13 (18.75) | 14 (37.5) |
|
| 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | - | - |
|
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | - | - |
| Penicillin | 33 (2.34) | 35 (1.17) | 29 (9.37) | 28 (9.37) | - | - |
| Itrazole | - | - | - | - | 31 (1.17) | 28 (9.37) |
Standard solutions of 150 μg/mL were used to find the Zone of Inhibition; for the selected compounds Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values are given in brackets.
Figure 1(3d, 3f, and 3j) docked into the binding site of E. coli FabH (1HNJ) enzyme and S. cerevisiae (5EQB) with Discovery studio client 4.2.
2-Hydroxy-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives (3a–k) demonstrating highest affinity (Moldock score) against E. coli FabH (pdb id: 1HNJ) as predicted by molecular docking.
| S. No | Ligand | Moldock Score [Grid](kcal/mol) | Moldock Score | Rerank Score | RMSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penicillin | −140.42 | −141.09 | −97.99 | 51.88 |
| 2 | Chrysin | −95.05 | −97.72 | −24.61 | 44.38 |
| 3 |
| −100.46 | −97.65 | −76.56 | 53.37 |
| 4 |
| −137.01 | −140.03 | −125.10 | 53.53 |
| 5 |
| −139.01 | −139.60 | −100.94 | 55.87 |
| 6 |
| −135.46 | −136.85 | −118.25 | 53.98 |
| 7 |
| −156.02 | −158.49 | −100.42 | 49.82 |
| 8 |
| −146.08 | −146.70 | −130.27 | 53.84 |
| 9 |
| −152.07 | −153.97 | −130.76 | 59.85 |
| 10 |
| −151.49 | −155.46 | −132.91 | 51.90 |
| 11 |
| −148.68 | −146.88 | −110.41 | 50.82 |
| 12 |
| −128.11 | −133.98 | −47.94 | 50.36 |
| 13 |
| −154.52 | −157.49 | −102.96 | 43.40 |
| 14 |
| −137.98 | −139.31 | −108.02 | 53.31 |
2-Hydroxy-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives (3a–k) demonstrating highest affinity (Moldock score) against S. cerevisiae (pdb id: 5EQB) as predicted by molecular docking.
| S. No | Ligand | Moldock Score [Grid](kcal/mol) | Moldock Score | Rerank Score | RMSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Itrazole | −213.68 | −218.38 | −171.75 | 38.25 |
| 2 | Chrysin | −96.56 | −94.56 | −81.26 | 38.67 |
| 3 |
| −116.34 | −115.26 | −97.75 | 32.62 |
| 4 |
| −157.20 | −154.09 | −127.09 | 35.42 |
| 5 |
| −169.85 | −170.41 | −140.99 | 35.93 |
| 6 |
| −161.94 | −164.89 | −134.37 | 29.90 |
| 7 |
| −184.72 | −186.61 | −154.64 | 29.64 |
| 8 |
| −167.83 | −170.79 | −143.70 | 30.06 |
| 9 |
| −186.76 | −189.74 | −155.25 | 36.50 |
| 10 |
| −176.23 | −173.46 | −128.58 | 38.73 |
| 11 |
| −190.54 | −192.50 | −157.04 | 29.60 |
| 12 |
| −160.31 | −161.26 | −116.69 | 36.54 |
| 13 |
| −187.92 | −189.65 | −141.46 | 28.25 |
| 14 |
| −165.14 | −164.57 | −140.99 | 36.04 |
Pharmacokinetic properties of chrysin, its 2-hydroxy-3-chrysino dithiocarbamate derivatives (3a–k) and standard drug penicillin.
| Comp | Gpcr Ligand | Ion Channel Modulator | Kinase Inhibitor | Nuclear Receptor Ligand | Protease Inhibitor | Enzyme Inhibitor | milogP [a] | TPSA (A2) [b] | n Violation [c] | M.wt [d] | nON [e] | nOHNH [f] | %ABS | MV [g] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ≤5 | --- | ≤1 | <500 | <10 | <5 | ||||||||
|
| 0.01 | −0.42 | −0.71 | −0.37 | 0.86 | 0.30 | 1.82 | 86.71 | 0 | 334.40 | 6 | 2 | 79.08 | 287.55 |
|
| −0.11 | −0.08 | 0.15 | 0.30 | −0.30 | 0.26 | 2.94 | 70.67 | 0 | 254.24 | 4 | 2 | 84.61 | 216.03 |
|
| −0.03 | −0.35 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 3.31 | 72.20 | 0 | 310.31 | 5 | 1 | 84.09 | 265.57 |
|
| −0.12 | −0.54 | −0.31 | −0.21 | −0.28 | 0.07 | 4.70 | 83.14 | 0 | 471.60 | 6 | 2 | 80.31 | 407.39 |
|
| −0.12 | −0.54 | −0.29 | −0.19 | −0.26 | 0.01 | 4.20 | 83.14 | 0 | 457.57 | 6 | 2 | 80.31 | 390.59 |
|
| −0.18 | −0.61 | −0.29 | −0.24 | −0.31 | 0.04 | 3.64 | 92.37 | 0 | 473.57 | 7 | 2 | 77.13 | 399.57 |
|
| −0.11 | −0.62 | −0.27 | −0.25 | −0.26 | 0.01 | 5.08 | 86.38 | 2 | 562.71 | 7 | 2 | 79.19 | 491.58 |
|
| −0.14 | −0.55 | −0.29 | −0.24 | −0.28 | 0.08 | 4.18 | 83.14 | 0 | 489.64 | 6 | 2 | 80.31 | 408.71 |
|
| −0.10 | −0.69 | −0.28 | −0.27 | −0.27 | −0.04 | 5.25 | 86.38 | 2 | 580.70 | 7 | 2 | 79.18 | 496.51 |
|
| −0.04 | −0.51 | −0.13 | −0.27 | −0.26 | 0.09 | 4.48 | 99.27 | 1 | 549.67 | 8 | 2 | 74.75 | 470.62 |
|
| −0.14 | −0.71 | −0.30 | −0.30 | −0.32 | −0.09 | 5.44 | 95.61 | 2 | 578.71 | 8 | 2 | 76.01 | 500.32 |
|
| −0.09 | −0.48 | −0.23 | −0.13 | −0.20 | 0.02 | 4.30 | 92.37 | 1 | 501.63 | 7 | 2 | 77.13 | 432.75 |
|
| −0.03 | −0.50 | −0.27 | −0.12 | −0.06 | 0.09 | 4.72 | 112.68 | 1 | 572.71 | 9 | 2 | 70.12 | 497.52 |
|
| −0.17 | −0.60 | −0.34 | −0.24 | −0.35 | 0.04 | 4.55 | 83.14 | 0 | 459.59 | 6 | 2 | 80.31 | 400.95 |
[a] Calculated lipophilicity. [b] Total polar surface area. [c] No. of violations from Lipinski’s rule of five. [d] Molecular weight. [e] No. of hydrogen bond acceptors. [f] No. of hydrogen bond donors. [g] Molar volume.