| Literature DB >> 31435117 |
Antônio Augusto Guimarães Barros1, Victor Atsushi Kasuya Barbosa1, Lincoln Paiva Costa1, Euler de Carvalho Guedes1, Carlos César Vassalo1.
Abstract
Objective The objective of the present study is to evaluate the restoration capacity of the hip anatomic rotation center with the use of acetabular tantalum cups, associated or not with addition wedges. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty revision using tantalum between June 2013 and April 2017. The abduction angle of the acetabular component and the horizontal and vertical distances of the component to the center of anatomical rotation of the hip were evaluated. The measurements were made through baseline radiographs performed in the preoperative period and at the last follow-up visit. Results A sample of 21 patients was obtained, 11 (52%) men and 10 (48%) women, with a mean age of 62 ± 13 years old. The mean abduction angle of the acetabular cup decreased from 48.76° ± 13.88 ° in the preoperative period to 38.52° ± 10.08 ° in the postoperative period, and this difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.001). The distances from the center of rotation of the prosthesis relative to the center of anatomical rotation of the hip were also lower after revision surgery with tantalum. The mean horizontal distance of 12.74 ± 10.59 mm was reduced to 7.11 ± 4.84 mm, and the mean vertical distance was reduced from 14.79 ± 10.05 mm to 4.89 ± 6.21 mm, and these reductions were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Hip arthroplasty revision with tantalum cups, associated or not with addition wedges, significantly recovered the anatomical rotation center of the hip.Entities:
Keywords: acetabulum; arthroplasty, replacement, hip; tantalum
Year: 2019 PMID: 31435117 PMCID: PMC6701971 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 0102-3616
Fig. 1Trabecular metal use in the last 5 years.
Sample characteristics
|
Patients,
| 21 |
|---|---|
|
Gender,
| |
| Male | 11 (52.4%) |
| Female | 10 (47.6%) |
| Mean age, years old (standard deviation) | 62 (±13.2) |
|
Revision indication,
| |
| Aseptic release | 15 (71.4%) |
| Instability | 1 (4.8%) |
| Infection | 3 (14.3%) |
| Pain | 2 (9.5%) |
|
Number of previous revisions,
| |
| 0 | 11 (52.4%) |
| 1 | 8 (38.1%) |
| 2 | 2 (9.5%) |
|
Paprosky classification,
| |
| Type 1 | 3 (14.3%) |
| Type 2ª | 3 (14.3%) |
| Type 2B | 6 (28.6%) |
| Type 2C | 0 (0%) |
| Type 3ª | 2 (9.5%) |
| Type 3B | 2 (9.5%) |
| Pelvic discontinuity | 5 (23.8%) |
Radiological results of hip mechanics
| Preoperative | Postoperative |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Acetabular cup abduction angle
| 48.76 ± 13.88 | 38.52 ± 10.08 |
|
|
Horizontal distance
| 12.74 ± 10.59 | 7.11 ± 4.84 |
|
|
Vertical distance
| 14.79 ± 10.05 | 4.89 ± 6.21 |
|
Value in degrees.
Value in mm.
Two-tailed Student t-test.
Correlation between preoperative and postoperative radiological values a
| R value |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Acetabular cup abduction angle | 0.525 | p = 0.015 |
| Horizontal distance | 0.928 | p < 0.001 |
| Vertical distance | 0.792 | p < 0.001 |
Spearman correlation coefficient.
Comparison of postoperative radiological results between the groups with and without previous revisions
| Absence of previous revision | Presence of previous revision |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Acetabular cup abduction angle
| 36.09 ± 11.29 | 41.20 ± 8.29 |
p = 0.256
|
|
Horizontal distance
| 6.36 ± 3.66 | 7.94 ± 5.98 |
p = 0.470
|
|
Vertical distance
| 3.65 ± 6.37 | 6.24 ± 6.06 |
p = 0.354
|
Value in degrees.
Value in mm.
Student t-test for independent samples.
Fig. 2Recovery of the hip rotation center with tantalum cup without addition of wedge. a) Preoperative radiography; b) Postoperative radiography.
Fig. 3Recovery of the hip rotation center with tantalum cup and addition of wedge. a) Preoperative radiography; b) Postoperative radiography.
Fig. 1Uso do metal trabecular nos últimos 5 anos.
Características da amostra
|
Pacientes,
| 21 |
|---|---|
|
Gênero,
| |
| Masculino | 11 (52,4%) |
| Feminino | 10 (47,6%) |
| Idade média, anos (desvio padrão) | 62 (±13,2) |
|
Indicação da revisão,
| |
| Soltura asséptica | 15 (71,4%) |
| Instabilidade | 1 (4,8%) |
| Infecção | 3 (14,3%) |
| Dor | 2 (9,5%) |
|
Número de revisões prévias,
| |
| 0 | 11 (52,4%) |
| 1 | 8 (38,1%) |
| 2 | 2 (9,5%) |
|
Classificação Paprosky,
| |
| Tipo 1 | 3 (14,3%) |
| Tipo 2ª | 3 (14,3%) |
| Tipo 2B | 6 (28,6%) |
| Tipo 2C | 0 (0%) |
| Tipo 3ª | 2 (9,5%) |
| Tipo 3B | 2 (9,5%) |
| Descontinuidade pélvica | 5 (23,8%) |
Resultados radiológicos da mecânica do quadril
| Pré-operatório | Pós-operatório |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ângulo de abdução da copa acetabular
| 48,76 ± 13,88 | 38,52 ± 10,08 |
p = 0,001
|
|
Distância horizontal
| 12,74 ± 10,59 | 7,11 ± 4,84 |
p < 0,001
|
|
Distância vertical
| 14,79 ± 10,05 | 4,89 ± 6,21 |
p < 0,001
|
Valor em graus.
Valor em mm.
Teste t de Student pareado.
Correlação entre os valores radiológicos pré- e pós-operatórios a
| Valor de r |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Ângulo de abdução da copa acetabular | 0,525 | p = 0,015 |
| Distância horizontal | 0,928 | p < 0,001 |
| Distância vertical | 0,792 | p < 0,001 |
Coeficiente de correlação de Spearman.
Comparação dos resultados radiológicos pós-operatório entre os grupos sem e com revisões prévias
| Ausência de revisão prévia | Presença de revisão prévia |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ângulo de abdução da copa acetabular
| 36,09 ± 11,29 | 41,20 ± 8,29 |
p = 0,256
|
|
Distância horizontal
| 6,36 ± 3,66 | 7,94 ± 5,98 |
p = 0,470
|
|
Distância vertical
| 3,65 ± 6,37 | 6,24 ± 6,06 |
p = 0,354
|
Valor em graus.
Valor em mm.
Teste t de Student para amostras independents.
Fig. 2Recuperação do centro de rotação do quadril com copa de tântalo sem adição de cunha. a) Radiografia pré-operatória; b) Radiografia pós-operatória.
Fig. 3Recuperação do centro de rotação do quadril com copa de tântalo e com cunha de adição. a) Radiografia pré-operatória; b) Radiografia pós-operatória.