Literature DB >> 19721038

Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20- to 25-year follow-up.

B W Schreurs1, J C Keurentjes, J W M Gardeniers, N Verdonschot, T J J H Slooff, R P H Veth.   

Abstract

We present an update of the clinical and radiological results of 62 consecutive acetabular revisions using impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafts and a cemented acetabular component in 58 patients, at a mean follow-up of 22.2 years (20 to 25). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the acetabular component with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 75% at 20 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 62 to 88) when 16 hips were at risk. Excluding two revisions for septic loosening at three and six years, the survivorship at 20 years was 79% (95% CI 67 to 93). With further exclusions of one revision of a well-fixed acetabular component after 12 years during a femoral revision and two after 17 years for wear of the acetabular component, the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 87% at 20 years (95% CI 76 to 97). At the final review 14 of the 16 surviving hips had radiographs available. There was one additional case of radiological loosening and four acetabular reconstructions showed progressive radiolucent lines in one or two zones. Acetabular revision using impacted large morsellised bone chips (0.5 cm to 1 cm in diameter) and a cemented acetabular component remains a reliable technique for reconstruction, even when assessed at more than 20 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19721038     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.21750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  32 in total

1.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up.

Authors:  Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Takashi Nishii; Masaki Takao; Hidenobu Miki; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.

Authors:  E Drampalos; A Fadulelmola; R Mohammed; D Shaw; S Subramanian; K D Jain; J Hodgkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Rosario Madero; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Exeter method-acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation.

Authors:  T G Petheram; J R Howell
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.