Literature DB >> 31429058

Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review.

Steven Samuel1, Geoff Cole2, Madeline J Eacott2.   

Abstract

Many languages assign nouns to a grammatical gender class, such that "bed" might be assigned masculine gender in one language (e.g., Italian) but feminine gender in another (e.g., Spanish). In the context of research assessing the potential for language to influence thought (the linguistic relativity hypothesis), a number of scholars have investigated whether grammatical gender assignment "rubs off" on concepts themselves, such that Italian speakers might conceptualize beds as more masculine than Spanish speakers do. We systematically reviewed 43 pieces of empirical research examining grammatical gender and thought, which together tested 5,895 participants. We classified the findings in terms of their support for this hypothesis and assessed the results against parameters previously identified as potentially influencing outcomes. Overall, we found that support was strongly task- and context-dependent, and rested heavily on outcomes that have clear and equally viable alternative explanations. We also argue that it remains unclear whether grammatical gender is in fact a useful tool for investigating relativity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grammatical gender; Language and thought; Linguistic relativity; Whorf

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31429058     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01652-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  38 in total

1.  Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: evidence from croatian.

Authors:  Albert Costa; Damir Kovacic; Evelina Fedorenko; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Grammatical gender and inferences about biological properties in german-speaking children.

Authors:  Henrik Saalbach; Mutsumi Imai; Lennart Schalk
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-11

4.  Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers.

Authors:  Panos Athanasopoulos; Emanuel Bylund
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-10-24

6.  Grammatical Gender and Mental Representation of Object: The Case of Musical Instruments.

Authors:  Jasmina Vuksanović; Jovana Bjekić; Natalija Radivojević
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

7.  The semantics of grammatical gender: a cross-cultural study.

Authors:  T Konishi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1993-09

8.  The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization.

Authors:  Roberto Cubelli; Daniela Paolieri; Lorella Lotto; Remo Job
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The thickness of musical pitch: psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity.

Authors:  Sarah Dolscheid; Shakila Shayan; Asifa Majid; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-28

10.  Grammar in art.

Authors:  Edward Segel; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-01-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  How bilinguals refer to Mandarin throwing actions in English.

Authors:  Elena Nicoladis; Helena Hong Gao
Journal:  Int J Billing       Date:  2021-06-04

2.  Implicit Representation of Grammatical Gender in Italian Children with Developmental Language Disorder: An Exploratory Study on Phonological and/or Syntactic Sensitivity.

Authors:  Caterina Artuso; Elena Fratini; Carmen Belacchi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-07-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.