Literature DB >> 23094696

Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers.

Panos Athanasopoulos1, Emanuel Bylund.   

Abstract

In this article, we explore whether cross-linguistic differences in grammatical aspect encoding may give rise to differences in memory and cognition. We compared native speakers of two languages that encode aspect differently (English and Swedish) in four tasks that examined verbal descriptions of stimuli, online triads matching, and memory-based triads matching with and without verbal interference. Results showed between-group differences in verbal descriptions and in memory-based triads matching. However, no differences were found in online triads matching and in memory-based triads matching with verbal interference. These findings need to be interpreted in the context of the overall pattern of performance, which indicated that both groups based their similarity judgments on common perceptual characteristics of motion events. These results show for the first time a cross-linguistic difference in memory as a function of differences in grammatical aspect encoding, but they also contribute to the emerging view that language fine tunes rather than shapes perceptual processes that are likely to be universal and unchanging.
Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23094696     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  12 in total

1.  How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French.

Authors:  Helen Engemann; Henriëtte Hendriks; Maya Hickmann; Efstathia Soroli; Coralie Vincent
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Steven Samuel; Geoff Cole; Madeline J Eacott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use.

Authors:  Jon A Willits; Michael S Amato; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Future Tense and Economic Decisions: Controlling for Cultural Evolution.

Authors:  Seán G Roberts; James Winters; Keith Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Grammatical Aspect and Mental Activation of Implied Instruments: A Mouse-Tracking Study in Persian.

Authors:  Ramin Golshaie; Sara Incera
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing.

Authors:  Stephanie Huette; Bodo Winter; Teenie Matlock; David H Ardell; Michael Spivey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  Effects of Language Background on Gaze Behavior: A Crosslinguistic Comparison Between Korean and German Speakers.

Authors:  Florian Goller; Donghoon Lee; Ulrich Ansorge; Soonja Choi
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-12-31

8.  Grammatical verb aspect and event roles in sentence processing.

Authors:  Carol Madden-Lombardi; Peter Ford Dominey; Jocelyne Ventre-Dominey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Psychological Impact of Different Grammaticalizations of the Future.

Authors:  Tiziana Jäggi; Sayaka Sato; Christelle Gillioz; Pascal Mark Gygax
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-05-07

10.  Cognitive Representation of Spontaneous Motion in a Second Language: An Exploration of Chinese Learners of English.

Authors:  Yinglin Ji
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.