Literature DB >> 11487292

Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.

L Boroditsky1.   

Abstract

Does the language you speak affect how you think about the world? This question is taken up in three experiments. English and Mandarin talk about time differently--English predominantly talks about time as if it were horizontal, while Mandarin also commonly describes time as vertical. This difference between the two languages is reflected in the way their speakers think about time. In one study, Mandarin speakers tended to think about time vertically even when they were thinking for English (Mandarin speakers were faster to confirm that March comes earlier than April if they had just seen a vertical array of objects than if they had just seen a horizontal array, and the reverse was true for English speakers). Another study showed that the extent to which Mandarin-English bilinguals think about time vertically is related to how old they were when they first began to learn English. In another experiment native English speakers were taught to talk about time using vertical spatial terms in a way similar to Mandarin. On a subsequent test, this group of English speakers showed the same bias to think about time vertically as was observed with Mandarin speakers. It is concluded that (1) language is a powerful tool in shaping thought about abstract domains and (2) one's native language plays an important role in shaping habitual thought (e.g., how one tends to think about time) but does not entirely determine one's thinking in the strong Whorfian sense. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11487292     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  101 in total

1.  Attention to context: U.S. and Japanese children's emotional judgments.

Authors:  Megumi Kuwabara; Ji Y Son; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  The long and the short of it: on the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time.

Authors:  Mahesh Srinivasan; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-08

3.  A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention.

Authors:  Peter T Radu; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel; James J Gross; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Visualizing space, time, and agents: production, performance, and preference.

Authors:  Angela Kessell; Barbara Tversky
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-17

5.  Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.

Authors:  Orna Peleg; Lee Edelist; Zohar Eviatar; Dafna Bergerbest
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

6.  A monolingual mind can have two time lines: Exploring space-time mappings in Mandarin monolinguals.

Authors:  Wenxing Yang; Ying Sun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

7.  The Interface of Language and Theory of Mind.

Authors:  Jill de Villiers
Journal:  Lingua       Date:  2007-11

8.  Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Dana Müller; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

9.  Culturally-Driven Biases in Preschoolers' Spatial Search Strategies for Ordinal and Non-Ordinal Dimensions.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Samuel Shaki; Talia Berkowitz
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2014-04-01

10.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.

Authors:  Yoav Bar-Anan; Nira Liberman; Yaacov Trope; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.