Literature DB >> 3142572

The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against.

P Skrabanek1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3142572      PMCID： PMC1834686          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Demands on surgical inpatient services after mass mammographic screening.

Authors:  L Holmberg; H O Adami; I Persson; T Lundström; L Tabar
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-27

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; D V McFarlane; I S Simor; R Jong; B J Shapiro; L Audet; M Petitclerc; D Ouimet-Oliva
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The physician's responsibility to the patient.

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Pensive women, painful vigils: consequences of delay in assessment of mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  I S Fentiman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-05-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Breast cancer screening: a different look at the evidence.

Authors:  C J Wright
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Breast screening: a subject for debate.

Authors:  J Austoker; D Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The debate over mass mammography in Great Britain.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-12-10

4.  Breast screening: a randomised controlled trial in UK general practice of three interventions designed to increase uptake.

Authors:  D J Sharp; T J Peters; J Bartholomew; A Shaw
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited.

Authors:  I T Gram; S E Slenker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Breast cancer screening: its impact on clinical medicine.

Authors:  H J de Koning; G J van Oortmarssen; B M van Ineveld; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Quality of life following a false positive mammogram.

Authors:  I T Gram; E Lund; S E Slenker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Values in breast cancer screening: an empirical study with Australian experts.

Authors:  Lisa Parker; Lucie Rychetnik; Stacy Carter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Evaluation issues in the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: An historical review.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Chen-Yang Hsu; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Kerri Beckmann; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Accuracy of the triple test in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses in Saudi females.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed Nasir Meshikhes
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.