Literature DB >> 2287014

Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?

P Skrabanek1.   

Abstract

It is a paradox that medical experimentation on individuals, whether patients or healthy volunteers, is now controlled by strict ethical guidelines, while no such protection exists for whole populations which are subjected to medical interventions in the name of preventive medicine or health promotion. As many such interventions are either of dubious benefit or of uncertain harm-benefit balance, such as mass screening for cancers or for risk factors associated with coronary heart disease, there is no justification for maintaining the ethical vacuum in which preventive medicine finds itself at present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2287014      PMCID: PMC1375909          DOI: 10.1136/jme.16.4.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  17 in total

Review 1.  Labelling of hypertensives: a review of the data.

Authors:  M H Alderman; B Lamport
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Breast cancer: the debates continue.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Drug trials: who takes the risk?

Authors:  V Tunkel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Blood cholesterol: is population screening warranted in the UK?

Authors:  W C Smith; M B Kenicer; A M Davis; A E Evans; J Yarnell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Gender, lipoproteins, diet, and cardiovascular risk. Sauce for the goose may not be sauce for the gander.

Authors:  J R Crouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Ethics and clinical research.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Health promotion--caring concern or slick salesmanship?

Authors:  G Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  A lesson from the mammography issue.

Authors:  P P Carbone
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Can health screening damage your health?

Authors:  H G Stoate
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

10.  Breast self-examination in young women: more harm than good?

Authors:  J W Frank; V Mai
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  26 in total

1.  Towards a philosophy of public health.

Authors:  D L Weed
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The pros and cons of immunisation -- Paper three: the difference between ideological and intellectual dissent.

Authors:  David H Stone
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-05

3.  Should public health respect autonomy?

Authors:  S A Hall
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Health promotion: time for a new philosophy?

Authors:  M P Kelly; B G Charlton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Ethics of preventive medicine.

Authors:  A Renton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  How should public health professionals engage with lay epidemiology?

Authors:  P Allmark; A Tod
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Ethics of preventive medicine.

Authors:  K McPherson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Ethics in preventive medicine.

Authors:  A G Capon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Ethics in preventive medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.