Literature DB >> 3764685

Breast cancer screening: a different look at the evidence.

C J Wright.   

Abstract

The data on screening for breast cancer were studied to extract information on rates of biopsy recommendation, detection of benign disease, and mortality. Relative and absolute mortality rates for breast cancer and other causes were calculated. Approximately 5% of women screened have a suspicious result and are referred for further assessment. The reduction in breast cancer mortality rates attributed to screening procedures ranges from 0.049% to 0.144% of the screened population, demonstrating that up to 2041 women must be screened for each woman who will benefit. If women subjected to operation for benign disease are considered to be harmed by the screening program, then the harm/benefit ratio ranges up to 62:1. It is suggested that enough information on the question of cost/harm/benefit is already available to make the decision that mass screening for breast cancer should be abandoned and that the procedure should be reserved for those women with high-risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3764685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  14 in total

1.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Assessing the benefits of health care: how far should we go?

Authors:  M Ryan; P Shackley
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

3.  The health of the nation.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-07-20

4.  The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against.

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

5.  Controversy over mammography screening.

Authors:  J Reidy; O Hoskins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

6.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Classification of findings in mammography screening--a method to minimise recall anxiety?

Authors:  M Pamilo; J Lönnqvist; A Halttunen; M Soiva; I Suramo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited.

Authors:  I T Gram; S E Slenker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

10.  Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three wave prospective study in England.

Authors:  S Sutton; G Saidi; G Bickler; J Hunter
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.