| Literature DB >> 31395006 |
Sandra Mendoza-Elizalde1,2,3, Ana Caren Cortés-Márquez2, Gerardo Zuñiga3, René Cerritos4, Pedro Valencia-Mayoral5, Alejandra Consuelo Sánchez6, Hector Olivares-Clavijo7, Norma Velázquez-Guadarrama8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori recurrence after successful eradication is an important problem. Children are particularly vulnerable to reinfection, by intrafamilial transmission which facilitates the acquisition or recombination of new genetic information by this bacterium. We investigated the evolutionary dynamics of 80 H. pylori strains isolated from two paediatric patients with recurrent infection (recrudescence and reinfection).Entities:
Keywords: Evolutionary relationship; Genetic variability; Helicobacter pylori; Paedriatric patients; Recurrent infection; Reinfection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31395006 PMCID: PMC6686460 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1554-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Susceptibility profile of the Helicobacter pylori strains identified from paedriatic patients during different events
| Strain | CLA | AMX | MTZ | TC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | First | Second | First | Second | First | Second | |
| [μg/mL] | [μg/mL] | [μg/mL] | [μg/mL] | |||||
| Patient One | ||||||||
| 1 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.125 | 0.062 |
| 2 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 3 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 32 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 4 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 5 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 128 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 6 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 7 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 8 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 32 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 9 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 10 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 128 | 0.125 | 0.062 |
| 11 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 12 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 13 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 32 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 14 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 15 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 128 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 16 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 17 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 18 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| 19 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 128 | 0.5 | 0.062 |
| 20 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 16 | 64 | 0.25 | 0.062 |
| Patient Two | ||||||||
| 1 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.0078 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 2 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
| 3 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 32 | 16 | 0.031 | 0.062 |
| 4 | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.0078 | 16 | 32 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 5 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 64 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 6 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
| 7 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.031 | 0.062 |
| 8 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 32 | 16 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 9 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
| 10 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 32 | 16 | 0.031 | 0.062 |
| 11 | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.0078 | 16 | 32 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 12 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 64 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 13 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
| 14 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 32 | 16 | 0.031 | 0.062 |
| 15 | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.0078 | 16 | 32 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 16 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 64 | 8 | 0.125 | 0.031 |
| 17 | < 0.078 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.062 | 32 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
| 18 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 32 | 16 | 0.031 | 0.062 |
| 19 | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.0078 | 16 | 32 | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| 20 | < 0.078 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 64 | 8 | 0.062 | 0.25 |
CLA: Clarithromycin (Resistant ≥1 μg/mL CLSI 2015) AMX: Amoxicillin (Resistant ≥4 g/mL Torres et al., 2001) MTZ: Metronidazole (Sensitive < 2 μg/mL; Intermediate 2 to 4 μg/mL; Low Resistant 8 to 16 μg/mL, Moderate Resistant 32 to 64 μg/mL; High Resistant ≥128 μg/mL Poon et al., 2009; Maggi et al., 2000 TC: Tetracycline ≥4 μg/mL Gerrits et al., 2003)
Characteristics of the Helicobacter pylori strains identified from patient one during different events
| Patient one | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of biopsy | First event | |||
| Strain | ST | Virulence genes |
| |
| August 2006 | 1 | 2888 |
| ABC |
| 2 | 2889 |
| ABCC | |
| 3 | 2890 |
| ABCC | |
| 4 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 5 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 6 | 2891 |
| ABCCC | |
| 7 | 288 |
| ABCC | |
| 8 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 9 | 288 |
| ABCC | |
| 10 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 11 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 12 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 13 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 14 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 15 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 16 | 2892 |
| ABCC | |
| 17 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 18 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| 19 | 2893 |
| ABCC | |
| 20 | 313 |
| ABCC | |
| October 2007 | Second event | |||
| Strain | ST | Virulence genes | EPIYA motif | |
| 1 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 2 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 3 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 4 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 5 | 313 |
| ABCCC | |
| 6 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 7 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 8 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 9 | 288 |
| ABCC | |
| 10 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 11 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 12 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 13 | 813 |
| ABCCC | |
| 14 | 313 |
| ABCCC | |
| 15 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 16 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 17 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
| 18 | 2887 |
| ABCCC | |
| 19 | 313 |
| ABCCC | |
| 20 | 288 |
| ABCCC | |
ST: Sequence Type
Characteristics of the Helicobacter pylori strains identified from patient two during different events
| Patient two | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of biopsy | First event | |||
| Strain | ST | Virulence genes | EPIYA motif | |
| October 2007 | 1 | 2894 |
| ABC& |
| 2 | 2895 |
| ABC | |
| 3 | 2896 |
| AAB&C | |
| 4 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 5 | 2894 |
| ABCC | |
| 6 | 2894 |
| ABCC | |
| 7 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 8 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 9 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 10 | 2894 |
| NEGATIVE | |
| 11 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 12 | 2897 |
| ABC | |
| 13 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 14 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 15 | 2898 |
| ABC | |
| 16 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 17 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 18 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 19 | 2898 |
| ABC | |
| 20 | 2898 |
| ABC | |
| June 2008 | Second event | |||
| Strain | ST | Virulence genes | EPIYA motif | |
| 1 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 2 | 2894 |
| AB&C | |
| 3 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 4 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 5 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 6 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 7 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 8 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 9 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 10 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 11 | 2894 |
| NEGATIVE | |
| 12 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 13 | 2899 |
| ABC | |
| 14 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 15 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 16 | 2900 |
| ABC | |
| 17 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 18 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 19 | 2894 |
| ABC | |
| 20 | 2894 |
| ABCCC | |
ST: Sequence Type; &: Amino acid change in EPIYA motif
Polymorphisms and features of housekeeping genes of Helicobacter pylori strains obtained from paediatric patients
| Gene | First event | Second event | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymorphic Sites | Haplotype | Hd | Π | Θ | Polymorphic Sites | Haplotype | Hd | Π | Θ | ||
| Patient one |
| 23 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.0036 | 0.0104 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 17 | 3 | 0.279 | 0.0087 | 0.0116 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 32 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.0084 | 0.0214 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 10 | 2 | 0.189 | 0.0047 | 0.0070 | 20 | 3 | 0.353 | 0.00960 | 0.01416 | |
|
| 45 | 4 | 0.284 | 0.0124 | 0.0290 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 31 | 4 | 0.284 | 0.0081 | 0.0159 | 14 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00239 | 0.00675 | |
|
| 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Concatenated | 158 | 8 | 0.647 | 0.00640 | 0.0134 | 34 | 4 | 0.432 | 0.00153 | 0.00281 | |
| Patient two |
| 17 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.00357 | 0.0076 | 23 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00367 | 0.1034 |
|
| 9 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00220 | 0.0061 | 9 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00220 | 0.00619 | |
|
| 37 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.01051 | 0.0248 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 18 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00452 | 0.0127 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 50 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.01412 | 0.0315 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 18 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00308 | 0.0086 | 18 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00308 | 0.00867 | |
|
| 19 | 3 | 0.353 | 0.00406 | 0.1050 | 21 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.00412 | 0.01161 | |
| Concatenated | 168 | 5 | 0.505 | 0.00577 | 0.0139 | 71 | 3 | 0.195 | 0.00208 | 0.00588 | |
Π: Nucleotide diversity per site; Θ: Average number of nucleotide differences per site
Fig. 1Evolutionary history among the STs of Helicobacter pylori identified in patient one with recurrent infection. a and b show the clonal relationships among the STs of H. pylori during the first and second infection events, respectively. Each line represents a different allele with mutational changes. PHYLOViZ (goeBURST algorithm) was used to define the clonal relationships [25]. a The main clonal complex in the first event was ST313 (12 strains), with five linked STs and two unlinked STs. b The main clonal complex in the second event was ST288 (15 strains), with three STs. c) Evolutionary relationships among the STs of H. pylori during both events. The neighbour-net graph defines the evolutionary relationships [26]; the black circles indicate the STs identified during the first infection event, and the red circles indicate the STs identified during the second infection event. Bootstrap values > 84% are indicated on the paths in the network. The highly branched network structure is indicative of possible recombination events among the STs
Fig. 2Evolutionary history among the STs of Helicobacter pylori identified in patient two with recurrent infection. a and b show the clonal relationships among the STs of H. pylori during the first and second infection events, respectively. Each line represents a different allele with mutational changes. PHYLOViZ (goeBURST algorithm) was used to define the clonal relationships [25]. a The main clonal complex in the first event was ST2894 (14 strains), with two linked STs and two unlinked STs. b The main clonal complexes in the second event were again ST2894 (18 strains), with only one ST, as well as ST2899, which was unlinked. c) Evolutionary relationships among the STs of H. pylori during both events. The neighbour-net graph defines the evolutionary relationships [26]; the black circles indicate the STs identified during the first infection event, and the blue circles indicate the STs identified during the second infection event. Bootstrap values > 85% are indicated on the paths in the network. The highly branched network structure is indicative of possible recombination events among the STs
Fig. 3Population “snapshot” of Helicobacter pylori STs found in the paediatric strains and clonal complexes ST313 and ST2894. Clusters of related isolates and individual unlinked STs found in the MLST database for H. pylori are presented as a single eBURST tree [http://www.phyloviz.net/goeburst/] defining category zero and comprising seven shared alleles. Unions link isolates that correspond to clonal complexes. Primary founders (blue) are located in the centre of the group, and the founders of the subgroups are shown for ST2888, ST2889, ST2895, ST2896 and ST2899 (red circles); the labels for the other STs [http://pubmlst.org//helicobacter/] have been removed for clarity. The predicted primary founders are ST313 and ST2894 (bootstrap value: 1000). The primary founders (blue) are located in the centre of the group, and the founders of the subgroups are shown in yellow
Fig. 4Phylogeography of the analysed STs. The phylogeography was inferred using the neighbour-joining method [27]. The optimal tree with a summed branch length of 3.97653233 is shown. The tree is drawn to scale; branch lengths with the same units as the evolutionary distances are used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [28], and the units are the number of base substitutions per site. The rate variations among the sites were modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis included 316 reference STs from the H. pylori MLST database [http://pubmlst.org/helicobacter/]. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. The major H. pylori populations were identified according to the assigned population available at PubMLST and the identification and positions of the 17 STs identified in this study are shown in the tree. There were 3402 positions in the final dataset. Phylogeography analyses were conducted using MEGA6 [29]