Literature DB >> 31394041

Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.

Hongmei Wang1, Shreya Roy2, Jungyoon Kim3, Paraskevi A Farazi4, Mohammad Siahpush5, Dejun Su6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are lower in rural areas in the USA. To guide the design of interventions to improve CRC screening, a systematic review was conducted to identify CRC screening barriers for rural populations.
METHODS: A search was conducted in four literature databases - Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus - for articles from 1998 to 2017 that examine CRC screening barriers in rural areas. This review included a total of 27 articles reporting perceived CRC screening barriers by rural residents or providers or examining factors associated with CRC screening of rural populations in the USA.
RESULTS: The most frequently reported barriers were high screening cost and lack of insurance coverage, embarrassment or discomfort undergoing screening, lack of knowledge or perceived need on CRC screening, and lack of physician recommendation. These barriers were confirmed in quantitative studies examining their association with CRC screening status. Age, marital status, and race/ethnicity were the most frequently reported factors associated with CRC screening in rural areas. Lack of prevention attitude toward cancer, perceived lack of privacy, shortage of specialists, and distance to test facilities were reported as rural-specific barriers for CRC screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Main barriers for CRC screening at both the individual and healthcare system level are identified in rural areas and they are in line with those found in urban areas in general. In particular, lack of prevention attitude toward cancer, perceived lack of privacy, shortage of specialists, and distance to test facilities disproportionately hamper CRC screening for rural Americans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRC screening; USA; facilitators; barriers

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31394041     DOI: 10.22605/RRH5181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  16 in total

1.  Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.

Authors:  Devan M Duenas; Kelly J Shipman; Kathryn M Porter; Elizabeth Shuster; Claudia Guerra; Ana Reyes; Tia L Kauffman; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond; Stephanie A Kraft
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lindsay M Sabik; Natasha K Stout; Michael T Halpern; Joseph Lipscomb; Scott Ramsey; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Colon and Rectal Cancer Management in Low-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Sonja Boatman; Harika Nalluri; Wolfgang B Gaertner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  A multilevel, low literacy dual language intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community clinics in Florida: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Steven K Sutton; Rania Abdulla; Carol Boxtha; Paola Gonzalez; Lakeshia Cousin; Aldenise Ewing; Samantha Montoya; Diana Lopez; Tina Beehler; Julian Sanchez; Rodrigo Carvajal; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.637

5.  Impact of Health Insurance, Poverty, and Comorbidities on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Insights from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Judith Staub; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Reaching Rural Residents to Identify Colorectal Cancer Education and Intervention Targets.

Authors:  Arnethea L Sutton; Michael A Preston; Maria Thomson; Charlotte Litzenberg; Trina F Taylor; Eva Polly Cole; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Perspectives on self-sampling for cancer screening among rural and urban women: Multilevel factors related to acceptability.

Authors:  Kelsey C Stoltzfus; Madyson L Popalis; Paul L Reiter; Jennifer L Moss
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  County-level characteristics associated with incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality from screenable cancers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Ming Wang; Menglu Liang; Alain Kameni; Kelsey C Stoltzfus; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  A narrative review of sociodemographic risk and disparities in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of the most common extrathoracic malignancies in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah Singh; Praveen Sridhar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Multilevel Associations with Cancer Screening Among Women in Rural, Segregated Communities Within the Northeastern USA: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Kelsey Leach; Kelsey C Stoltzfus; Marni Granzow; Paul L Reiter; Tracy Onega; Lisa M Klesges; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.