Literature DB >> 35788368

Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Ya-Chen Tina Shih1, Lindsay M Sabik2, Natasha K Stout3, Michael T Halpern4, Joseph Lipscomb5, Scott Ramsey6, Debra P Ritzwoller7.   

Abstract

Cancer screening has long been considered a worthy public health investment. Health economics offers the theoretical foundation and research methodology to understand the demand- and supply-side factors associated with screening and evaluate screening-related policies and interventions. This article provides an overview of health economic theories and methods related to cancer screening and discusses opportunities for future research. We review 2 academic disciplines most relevant to health economics research in cancer screening: applied microeconomics and decision science. We consider 3 emerging topics: cancer screening policies in national as well as local contexts, "choosing wisely" screening practices, and targeted screening efforts for vulnerable subpopulations. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of available data sources and opportunities for methodological research and training. Recommendations to strengthen research infrastructure include developing novel data linkage strategies, increasing access to electronic health records, establishing curriculum and training programs, promoting multidisciplinary collaborations, and enhancing research funding opportunities.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35788368      PMCID: PMC9255920          DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  79 in total

1.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.

Authors:  Howard Balshem; Mark Helfand; Holger J Schünemann; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Gunn E Vist; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Joerg Meerpohl; Susan Norris; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  For states that opt out of Medicaid expansion: 3.6 million fewer insured and $8.4 billion less in federal payments.

Authors:  Carter C Price; Christine Eibner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Barriers and Facilitators to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Immigrants in the United States.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; John W Cyrus; Matthew Asare; Lindsay M Sabik
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-06

4.  Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Economics of public health programs for underserved populations: a review of economic analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jaya S Khushalani; Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Emily A Burger; Catherine Regan; Stephen Sy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Affordable Care Act and Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Olive M Mbah; Alan C Kinlaw; Justin G Trogdon; Stephanie B Wheeler; Cleo A Samuel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evan R Myers; Patricia Moorman; Jennifer M Gierisch; Laura J Havrilesky; Lars J Grimm; Sujata Ghate; Brittany Davidson; Ranee Chatterjee Mongtomery; Matthew J Crowley; Douglas C McCrory; Amy Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Effectiveness of Using Personal Health Records to Improve Recommended Breast Cancer Screening and Reduce Racial and Geographic Disparities Among Women.

Authors:  Hyunmin Kim; Cyril F Chang
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Cost-Sharing and Out-of-Pocket Cost for Women Who Received MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  I-Wen Pan; Kevin C Oeffinger; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 11.816

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.