Literature DB >> 34560364

County-level characteristics associated with incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality from screenable cancers.

Jennifer L Moss1, Ming Wang2, Menglu Liang2, Alain Kameni2, Kelsey C Stoltzfus2, Tracy Onega3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening differs by rurality and racial residential segregation, but the relationship between these county-level characteristics is understudied. Understanding this relationship and its implications for cancer outcomes could inform interventions to decrease cancer disparities.
METHODS: We linked county-level information from national data sources: 2008-2012 cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates (for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer) from U.S. Cancer Statistics and the National Death Index; metropolitan status from U.S. Department of Agriculture; residential segregation derived from American Community Survey; and prevalence of cancer screening from National Cancer Institute's Small Area Estimates. We used multivariable, sparse Poisson generalized linear mixed models to assess cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates by county-level characteristics, controlling for density of physicians and median household income.
RESULTS: Cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates were 6-18% lower in metropolitan counties for breast and colorectal cancer, and 2-4% lower in more segregated counties for breast and colorectal cancer. Generally, reductions in cancer associated with residential segregation were limited to non-metropolitan counties. Cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality rates were associated with screening, with rates for corresponding cancers that were 2-9% higher in areas with more breast and colorectal screening, but 2-15% lower in areas with more cervical screening. DISCUSSION: Lower cancer burden was observed in counties that were metropolitan and more segregated. Effect modification was observed by metropolitan status and county-level residential segregation, indicating that residential segregation may impact healthcare access differently in different county types. Additional studies are needed to inform interventions to reduce county-level disparities in cancer incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer incidence; Cancer mortality; Cancer screening; Metropolitan status; Racial residential segregation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34560364      PMCID: PMC8627446          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  47 in total

Review 1.  Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.

Authors:  Zinzi D Bailey; Nancy Krieger; Madina Agénor; Jasmine Graves; Natalia Linos; Mary T Bassett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Residential segregation and lung cancer mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Awori J Hayanga; Steve B Zeliadt; Leah M Backhus
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Racial and ethnic residential segregation and access to health care in rural areas.

Authors:  Julia T Caldwell; Chandra L Ford; Steven P Wallace; May C Wang; Lois M Takahashi
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Shreya Roy; Jungyoon Kim; Paraskevi A Farazi; Mohammad Siahpush; Dejun Su
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Impact of Travel Distance and Urban-Rural Status on the Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Khodadad R Javaheri; Shilo V Lefresne; Caroline H Speers; Jenny Y Ruan; Jennifer T Chang; Carl J Brown; Hagen F Kennecke; Robert A Olson; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Shanita D Williams; Mohammad Siahpush; Aaron Mulhollen
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-14

7.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in an affluent population: Marin County, California, USA, 1990-1999.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; Sally L Glaser; Dee W West; Rochelle R Ereman; Christine A Erdmann; Janice M Barlow; Margaret R Wrensch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Rural-Urban and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence in the United States, 2010-2014.

Authors:  Lulu Yu; Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Joel E Segel; Eugene J Lengerich
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Factors Associated With Cancer Disparities Among Low-, Medium-, and High-Income US Counties.

Authors:  Jeremy M O'Connor; Tannaz Sedghi; Meera Dhodapkar; Michael J Kane; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-10-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Post-Acquisition Hyperpolarized 29Silicon Magnetic Resonance Image Processing for Visualization of Colorectal Lesions Using a User-Friendly Graphical Interface.

Authors:  Caitlin V McCowan; Duncan Salmon; Jingzhe Hu; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Nicholas Whiting; Jennifer S Davis; Daniel D Carson; Niki M Zacharias; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Mary C Farach-Carson
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.