Literature DB >> 35305995

A multilevel, low literacy dual language intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community clinics in Florida: A randomized controlled trial.

Shannon M Christy1, Steven K Sutton2, Rania Abdulla3, Carol Boxtha3, Paola Gonzalez4, Lakeshia Cousin5, Aldenise Ewing6, Samantha Montoya3, Diana Lopez7, Tina Beehler8, Julian Sanchez2, Rodrigo Carvajal3, Cathy D Meade2, Clement K Gwede2.   

Abstract

One of the largest disparities in cancer mortality in the United States occurs with colorectal cancer (CRC). The objectives of this multilevel two-arm intervention trial were to compare the efficacy of two interventions to promote CRC screening (CRCS) with fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and examine sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of FIT screening. Individuals ages 50-75 (n = 326) who were not up-to-date with CRCS, could understand English or Spanish, and were at average CRC risk were recruited from two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Florida. Prior to intervention, CRCS rates in the FQHCs were 27.1% and 32.9%, respectively. Study enrollment occurred April 2018-November 2019. System-level intervention components included leveraging electronic medical record (EMR) systems and delivering patient reminders. Participants were randomized to C-CARES (education+FIT) or C-CARES Plus (C-CARES+personalized coaching [for those not completing FIT within 90 days]). Primary outcome was completed FIT returned <1 year. Primary outcome analyses were performed using logistic regression. 225 participants completed FIT (69.0% [95% CI: 64.0-74.0%]), with no significant difference in FIT uptake by intervention arm (67.3% C-CARES Plus vs. 70.8% C-CARES; p = .49). FIT uptake was significantly higher among patients who received intervention materials in Spanish (77.2%) compared to those who received materials in English (63.2%, p < .01). The personalized coaching in the C-CARES Plus arm did not appear to provide added benefit beyond the C-CARES intervention. Multilevel approaches that include EMR prompts, reminders, FIT access, and provision of low-literacy, language-concordant education can support efforts to improved community clinics' CRCS rates. Future efforts should focus on repeat FIT screening. Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03906110).
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Fecal immunochemical test; Federally qualified health center; Low literacy English and Spanish language patient education; Multilevel intervention; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35305995      PMCID: PMC9018599          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.637


  26 in total

1.  Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities.

Authors:  Nina B Wallerstein; Bonnie Duran
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2006-06-07

2.  Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans.

Authors:  Margot B Kushel; Reena Gupta; Lauren Gee; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A Cancer Education-Plus-Navigation Intervention Implemented Within a Federally Qualified Health Center and Community-Based Settings.

Authors:  Cynthia M Mojica; Gulaiim Almatkyzy; Daisy Morales-Campos
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Shreya Roy; Jungyoon Kim; Paraskevi A Farazi; Mohammad Siahpush; Dejun Su
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar; Monika Kastner; Vincent Vuong; Laure Perrier; Corinne Daly; Linda Rabeneck; Sharon Straus; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center.

Authors:  Kishore Khankari; Mickey Eder; Chandra Y Osborn; Gregory Makoul; Marla Clayman; Silvia Skripkauskas; Linda Diamond-Shapiro; Dan Makundan; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  An Examination of Multilevel Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Accountable Care Organization Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Jungyoon Kim; Hongmei Wang; Lufei Young; Tzeyu L Michaud; Mohammad Siahpush; Paraskevi A Farazi; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec

10.  Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Laura A Szalacha; Jennifer Kue; Patricia M Herman; Julie Bucho-Gonzalez; Peter Lance; Linda Larkey
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.