Literature DB >> 3138659

Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity.

P M Sharp1, E Cowe, D G Higgins, D C Shields, K H Wolfe, F Wright.   

Abstract

The genetic code is degenerate, but alternative synonymous codons are generally not used with equal frequency. Since the pioneering work of Grantham's group it has been apparent that genes from one species often share similarities in codon frequency; under the "genome hypothesis" there is a species-specific pattern to codon usage. However, it has become clear that in most species there are also considerable differences among genes. Multivariate analyses have revealed that in each species so far examined there is a single major trend in codon usage among genes, usually from highly biased to more nearly even usage of synonymous codons. Thus, to represent the codon usage pattern of an organism it is not sufficient to sum over all genes as this conceals the underlying heterogeneity. Rather, it is necessary to describe the trend among genes seen in that species. We illustrate these trends for six species where codon usage has been examined in detail, by presenting the pooled codon usage for the 10% of genes at either end of the major trend. Closely-related organisms have similar patterns of codon usage, and so the six species in Table 1 are representative of wider groups. For example, with respect to codon usage, Salmonella typhimurium closely resembles E. coli, while all mammalian species so far examined (principally mouse, rat and cow) largely resemble humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3138659      PMCID: PMC338553          DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  11 in total

1.  Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause.

Authors:  S Aota; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes.

Authors:  P M Sharp; T M Tuohy; K R Mosurski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy; R Mercier; A Pavé
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy; M Jacobzone; R Mercier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases.

Authors:  D C Shields; P M Sharp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Codon selection in yeast.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen; B D Hall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  198 in total

1.  Oligomerization of the integrin alphaIIbbeta3: roles of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.

Authors:  R Li; C R Babu; J D Lear; A J Wand; J S Bennett; W F DeGrado
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the evolution of codon volatility.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Novel transcript truncating function of Rap1p revealed by synthetic codon-optimized Ty1 retrotransposon.

Authors:  Robert M Yarrington; Sarah M Richardson; Cheng Ran Lisa Huang; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Ecological adaptation in bacteria: speciation driven by codon selection.

Authors:  Adam C Retchless; Jeffrey G Lawrence
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Codon usage tabulated from the GenBank genetic sequence data.

Authors:  K Wada; Y Wada; H Doi; F Ishibashi; T Gojobori; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Extreme differences in charge changes during protein evolution.

Authors:  J A Leunissen; H W van den Hooven; W W de Jong
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Sequence analysis suggests that tetra-nucleotides signal the termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes.

Authors:  C M Brown; P A Stockwell; C N Trotman; W P Tate
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Switches in species-specific codon preferences: the influence of mutation biases.

Authors:  D C Shields
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Compositional heterogeneity of the Escherichia coli genome: a role for VSP repair?

Authors:  G Gutiérrez; J Casadesús; J L Oliver; A Marín
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Phylogeny of Drosophila and related genera inferred from the nucleotide sequence of the Cu,Zn Sod gene.

Authors:  J Kwiatowski; D Skarecky; K Bailey; F J Ayala
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.