Literature DB >> 2120452

Switches in species-specific codon preferences: the influence of mutation biases.

D C Shields1.   

Abstract

A model of synonymous codon usage is developed in which the most frequent codons are selectively advantageous because of their coadaptation with tRNA abundances. Random drift opposes the progress of this coevolution by pushing codon frequencies in the direction of the frequency that would result from mutation in the absence of selection. It is predicted that, within a certain range, an increased mutation bias away from an advantageous codon has little influence on its usage in highly expressed genes. However, a subsequent small increase in mutation bias over a critical range leads to a large reduction in the frequency of the codon. The switch in preference from one synonym to another is a sharp transition, with no stable intermediate state in which neither codon is advantageous. Codon usage patterns were compared among three related bacterial species of differing genomic G & C contents, Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Proteus vulgaris. It was found that although changes in mutation biases do not always result in switches in codon preferences, some switches have occurred in the direction of species-specific mutation biases. Fluctuating mutation biases may therefore be the main cause of differences between species in their codon preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2120452     DOI: 10.1007/bf02109476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  27 in total

1.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Location and nucleotide sequence of frdB, the gene coding for the iron-sulphur protein subunit of the fumarate reductase of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S T Cole; T Grundström; B Jaurin; J J Robinson; J H Weiner
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1982-08

4.  Nucleotide sequence coding for the flavoprotein subunit of the fumarate reductase of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S T Cole
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1982-03-01

5.  The concentration dependence of the error frequencies and some related quantities in protein synthesis.

Authors:  G von Heijne; C Blomberg
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases.

Authors:  D C Shields; P M Sharp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Cloning and DNA sequence determination of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris: translational feedback regulation of the Escherichia coli L11 operon by heterologous L1 proteins.

Authors:  F Sor; M Nomura
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1987-11

8.  Overlap between ampC and frd operons on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  T Grundström; B Jaurin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-09-25       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

Authors:  H Grosjean; W Fiers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  25 in total

1.  The evolutionary selection of DNA base pairs in gene-regulatory binding sites.

Authors:  O G Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias.

Authors:  Paul M Sharp; Laura R Emery; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Directional mutation pressure, mutator mutations, and dynamics of molecular evolution.

Authors:  N Sueoka
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Chloroplast DNA codon use: evidence for selection at the psb A locus based on tRNA availability.

Authors:  B R Morton
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Rates of DNA evolution in Drosophila depend on function and developmental stage of expression.

Authors:  J R Powell; A Caccone; J M Gleason; L Nigro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Switch in codon bias and increased rates of amino acid substitution in the Drosophila saltans species group.

Authors:  F Rodríguez-Trelles; R Tarrío; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolution of the recA gene and the molecular phylogeny of bacteria.

Authors:  A T Lloyd; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Mammalian mitochondrial DNA evolution: a comparison of the cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase II genes.

Authors:  R L Honeycutt; M A Nedbal; R M Adkins; L L Janecek
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Evolution of codon usage patterns: the extent and nature of divergence between Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A T Lloyd; P M Sharp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.