Literature DB >> 31384571

Motives for - and prevalence of - cesarean delivery on maternal request: A survey in Saudi Arabia.

Anwar E Ahmed1, Rouzait S Mohammad2.   

Abstract

Background: Although cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) has been associated with an increase in the frequency of cesarean sections (CSs), there is a lack of studies reporting the frequency of CDMR in Saudi Arabia. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of and the motives for CDMR and identify its associated factors.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between March and June 2017 on 364 pregnant women who planned a CS at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. The characteristics of the women and their motives for undergoing a CS for the current pregnancy term were collected.
Results: The prevalence of CDMR was found to be 13.7% (50/364) [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.370%-17.706%]. Older maternal age ( ≥ 40 years) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.9; p = 0.019], family history of CS (aOR = 2.9; p = 0.038), non-Saudi nationality (aOR = 5.0; p = 0.050), and receiving education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS (aOR = 13.7; p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of CDMR. As the number of previous CSs increased by one (aOR = 0.6; p = 0.011), the odds of CDMR decreased by 40%. The most common motives for demanding a CS in the absence of medical indications were avoiding labor or possible complications from vaginal birth (60%) and fear of pain on vaginal delivery (46%). Conclusions: A high prevalence of CDMR was documented at King Abdulaziz Medical City, especially among women of older maternal age, having a family history of CS, of non-Saudi nationality, and who received education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS. Counseling programs might be helpful for pregnant women who fear pain in vaginal delivery or have had a previous traumatic birth experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saudi Arabia; cesarean delivery on maternal request; older maternal age; on demand

Year:  2019        PMID: 31384571      PMCID: PMC6657227          DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2019.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qatar Med J        ISSN: 0253-8253


Introduction

The worldwide prevalence of cesarean deliveries has increased dramatically over the past few decades.[1,2] In fact, cesarean deliveries have evidently become an epidemic phenomenon in some parts of the world, whereas the number of vaginal deliveries is on the decline.[1-6] Furthermore, several reports have mentioned that cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) is the major contributor for the increasing prevalence of cesarean deliveries.[1,2,5-8] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has defined CDMR “as a primary cesarean delivery at maternal request in the absence of any medical or obstetric indication,”[9] wherein cesarean deliveries are performed due to nonmedical or emergency reasons. The rate of CDMR shows significant variations according to the country. In China, the rate exceeds 24%,[10] whereas it is 8% in Sweden,[11] 5.1% in Switzerland,[12] 3.2% in Denmark,[5] 3% in the United States,[13] and 3% in in Australia among all deliveries.[14] In Saudi Arabia, several studies have investigated CDMR[15-17]; however, only one study that was based on a retrospective cohort study design (medical records) reported a rate of CDMR of 10.1%.[15] A previous history of a cesarean section (CS) has been reported to be a major contributor for increasing the rate of CDMR.[12,18,19] In addition, women with an older maternal age are known to often request a cesarean delivery.[4,5,20,21] However, to our knowledge, it still remains unknown whether the trend of CDMR exists in Saudi Arabia, and if so, the nature of its contributing factors is also not clear. The most common reasons influencing women's decisions for requesting a CS have been found to be 1) anxiety due to lack of support during labor and 2) concern for fetal injury or death.[22] In Saudi Arabia, no study has yet reported the reasons or motivations for demanding delivery by a CS in the absence of medical indications. In the present study, several hypotheses were investigated, whether 1) older maternal age, 2) family history of CS, and 3) receiving education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS increase the rate of CDMR. The aims of this study were to 1) estimate the prevalence of CDMR among women who undergo cesarean delivery at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, 2) identify the factors associated with the high rate of CDMR, and 3) determine the motives for requesting CDMR.

Methods

A self-reporting cross-sectional survey was performed to determine the motives and the prevalence of CDMR among women who attended routine pregnancy follow-up in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh between March and June 2017. This study was approved by the institutional review board at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center in Riyadh, with the study approval # RC17/051-R. Pregnant women were asked whether they would undergo or were planning a CS for the current pregnancy term. Only those who would undergo or were planning a CS were included. A total of 440 pregnant women who responded that they would undergo or were planning a CS for the current pregnancy term were requested to participate in the study. Written informed consents were obtained from each participant. Of these 440 pregnant women, 364 consented to participate and complete the study questionnaire, with a response rate of 82.7%. An anonymous questionnaire was used in this study, which included demographic and clinical characteristics. Study participants were asked whether they intended to have a CS for the current pregnancy term in the absence of medical reasons. Data were collected about the motives for having a CS for the current pregnancy term, whether they received education or medical information on the possibility of delivering by CS, and the sources of education or medical information.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS software, version 24, for Windows. The characteristics of the study participants were summarized using frequency and percentages (Table 1). The prevalence of CDMR was reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of CDMR was classified according to the characteristics of the women and assessed by a Chi-square test to determine the relationships between the characteristics of the participants and the prevalence of CDMR (Table 1). Women's motives for intending to undergo a CS were summarized using frequency and percentages (Table 2). A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the factors associated with the high prevalence of CDMR (Table 3). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit for the model.
Table 1

Sample characteristics and its association with cesarean delivery on maternal request (n = 364).

OverallNoYes

n = 364314 (86.3%)50 (13.7%)

Levelsn%n%n%P

Age  < 4032991.428686.94313.10.170

 ≥ 40318.62477.4722.6

University Yes18052.015385.02715.00.331

No16648.014788.61911.4

Income No income or < 5000 SR3410.22882.4617.60.495

5000–10,000 SR28385.024787.33612.7

>10,000 SR164.81487.5212.5

Nationality Saudi33396.229087.14312.90.023*

Non-Saudi133.8861.5538.5

Employed Yes9527.48791.688.40.073

No25272.621284.14015.9

Family history of CS Yes4112.52868.31331.70.001*

No28687.525488.83211.2

Received education or medical information on the possibility to deliver by CS? Yes30182.725484.44715.60.023*

No6317.36095.234.8

Health educator Yes8022.06682.51417.50.268

No28478.024887.33612.7

Nurse Yes5314.64177.41222.60.042*

No31185.427387.83812.2

OB/GYN doctor Yes17247.314282.63017.40.052

No19252.717289.62010.4

Internet Yes19052.217089.52010.50.063

No17447.814482.83017.2

Husband Yes318.52477.4722.60.135

No33391.529087.14312.9

Friends Yes13837.911784.82115.20.521

No22662.119787.22912.8

*Chi-square is significant at α = 0.05. ($1 = SR 3.75), CS = cesarean section. %, percent; n, sample in each category.

Table 2

Motives related to cesarean delivery on maternal request (n = 50).

Motivesn%

Fear of labor pain and childbirth 2346.0

A previous traumatic delivery 1326.0

Previous traumatic antenatal 12.0

To avoid labor or possible complications of vaginal birth 3060.0

Older maternal age 612.0

Precious first baby 714.0

In vitro fertilization baby 12.0

Sexual dysfunction 00.0

Concern on unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) 1530.0

Concern on using instrumental (forceps and ventouse) deliveries 48.0

The belief of CS can effectively prevent subsequent incontinence 510.0

%percent; n, sample in each category.

Table 3

Multivariate factors associated with cesarean delivery on maternal request (n = 364).

95% CI for OR

Factors BSEPORLowerUpper

Age ≥ 40 years 1.350.580.019*3.91.25111.937

University 0.300.440.5031.30.5653.202

No income or income  < 5000 SR 0.491.360.7171.60.11323.796

Income 5000–10,000 SR 0.611.180.6011.80.18518.515

Saudi nationality  − 1.490.760.050*0.20.0510.998

Employed  − 0.810.520.1180.40.1601.229

Family history of CS 1.070.520.038*2.91.0588.018

Received education or medical info on CS 2.621.200.030*13.71.295144.556

Number of previous CS  − 0.540.210.011*0.60.3860.883

*Wald Chi-square test is significant at α = 0.05. ($1 = SR 3.75), CS = cesarean section. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 364 pregnant women undergoing a CS. The mean age of the women was 31.3 ( ± SD = 5.7) years, with an age range of 16–45 years. A little more than half of the women had a university degree, 10.2% of them had no or low income, and 12.5% had a family history of CS. The overall prevalence of CDMR was found to be 13.7% (50/364) (95% CI: 10.370%–17.706%). Table 2 presents the women's motives for intending to undergo a CS. Regarding the motives for CDMR, the following information were obtained: 60% (30/50) of the women reported that they chose to avoid labor or possible complications from vaginal birth, 46% (23/50) reported fear of labor pain and childbirth, 30% (15/50) reported concerns about unsuccessful vaginal birth after cesarean, 26% (13/50) reported that they had a previous traumatic delivery, 14% (7/50) reported having a precious first baby (a baby born after multiple poor pregnancy outcomes), and 12% (6/50) reported an older maternal age. Results of subgroup analyses shown in Table 1 report the prevalence of CDMR classified according to the characteristics of the women. A higher prevalence of CDMR was detected among non-Saudi women (38.5% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.023), women with a family history of CS (31.7% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.001), and those who received education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS (15.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.023). Moreover, women who received education or medical information from a nurse about the possibility of delivering by CS were included (22.6% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.042). Table 3 shows the multivariate factors associated with the prevalence of CDMR. After adjusting for the study sample characteristics, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with a high prevalence of CDMR: older maternal age [odds ratio (OR): 3.9 (95% CI: 1.251–11.937)], family history of CS [OR: 2.9 (95% CI: 1.058–8.018)], and receiving education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS [OR: 13.7 (95% CI: 1.295–144.556)]. In contrast, the following factors were significantly associated with a low prevalence of CDMR: Saudi nationality [OR: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.051–0.998)] and an increase in the number of previous CSs [OR: 0.6 (95% CI: 0.386–0.883)]. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated that the model has a good fit for the data (p = 0.088).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study determined the prevalence of CDMR in a sample of pregnant women attending routine pregnancy follow-up in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. This topic was focused upon because of the following reasons: 1) CDMR is present in the Saudi population but with undocumented frequency, 2) the CS rate at our center (King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh) has been reported to be 19.1% during June 2008 to February 2011,[15] which exceeds the rate of CS (10%–15%) recommended by the World Health Organization,[23] 3) it has not yet been documented in Saudi Arabia whether demanding a CS is below the high rate of CS, and 4) it was intended to evaluate the motives for CDMR in pregnant women at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. Based on our study results, CDMR at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh contributed to a high number of CSs. The prevalence of CDMR among pregnant women who were undergoing cesarean delivery at our center was found to be 13.7% (95% CI: 10.370%–17.706%). This prevalence was found to be nonsignificantly higher than that reported at our center (a rate of 10.1%) in an earlier research that was based on a different study design (retrospective cohort) by Al Rowaily et al.[15] However, our finding was significantly higher than that reported in studies conducted in Western countries[5,12-14] but significantly lower than that reported in China.[10] These differences in CDMR prevalence could be due to the effects of culture, healthcare setting, and political motives. Women's motives for demanding the procedure in the absence of medical indications may result in an increase in the number of CSs. Our results indicated that the most common motives for demanding a CS in the absence of medical indications were to avoid labor or possible complications from vaginal birth (60%), followed by fear of pain on vaginal delivery (46%), concerns about unsuccessful vaginal birth after a CS (30%), and a previous traumatic delivery (26%). These motives have also been reported in several studies in various populations.[22,24-27] In Saudi Arabia, the motives for CDMR need further investigation, including the assessment of women's knowledge and attitude about CDMR and its complications. This is because a study among pregnant women in Singapore found that low levels of awareness about cesarean delivery predicted complications.[28] In the present study, women of older maternal age reported a higher rate of CDMR, which is consistent with several studies.[4,5,20,21,25] This finding is expected, as a maternal age >35 years has been considered as a prognostic factor for CDMR and may lead to a cesarean delivery as it is a factor responsible for a high-risk pregnancy.[29,30] This study also demonstrated that the adjusted ORs of CDMR were 2.9 times higher among pregnant women with a family history of CS than among those without a family history of CS. A study by Chong et al., has reported similar results, wherein 50% of their sample had their relatives or friends requesting a CS.[28] A significant association was also found between receiving education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS and the high rate of CDMR. Pregnant women who received education or medical information about this issue were 13.7 times more likely to request a CS in the absence of medical indications than those who did not receive education or medical information. Results of the bivariate analysis of data regarding the sources of information showed that receiving education or medical information from a nurse about the possibility of delivering by CS was associated with CDMR in the absence of medical indications. This association should be assessed in future research by 1) developing related policies of cesarean delivery on demand or 2) conducting educational programs on the potential complications of CS to reduce the rate of CDMR.[31] There are several issues that could limit the results of this study. Because of the cross-sectional study design, the findings must be carefully interpreted as associations and do not represent causation. The study sample represents pregnant women who attended routine pregnancy follow-up in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. CDMR was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire rather than through a retrospective review. Nevertheless, this study provides useful results in terms of several aspects, as it documents 1) the rate of CDMR in a sample of pregnant women in Saudi Arabia, 2) that CDMR is associated not only with older maternal age or family history of CS but also with having received education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS, and 3) women's motives to demand a CS in the absence of medical indications in Saudi Arabia.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of CDMR was detected at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, especially among women with older maternal age, family history of CS, non-Saudi nationality, and those who received education or medical information about the possibility of delivering by CS. An interventional educational program on the potential complications of CS is warranted to reduce the rate of CDMR. The most commonly reported motives for demanding a CS were related to labor such as complications and fear of pain on vaginal delivery. Counseling programs might be useful to pregnant women who fear pain in vaginal delivery or have had a traumatic birth experience.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.
  35 in total

1.  Cesarean section on request.

Authors:  Sadek Pharaon
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 2.  Elective cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Authors:  Jeffrey Ecker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Indications for cesarean section on maternal request--guidelines for counseling and treatment.

Authors:  Ingela Wiklund; Ellika Andolf; Håkan Lilja; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2012-07-20

4.  [Cesarean section on request because of labor pain--bioethical and legal views].

Authors:  Aleksandra Frković; Zvonko Bosković
Journal:  Acta Med Croatica       Date:  2010-03

5.  NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Authors: 
Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements       Date:  2006 Mar 27-29

6.  [Cesarean section on maternal request].

Authors:  Malene Merete Forstholm; Ojvind Lidegaard
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2009-02-09

7.  Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers.

Authors:  Ingela Wiklund; Gunnar Edman; Ellika Andolf
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 8.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Pregnant women's perception of cesarean section on demand.

Authors:  Sibil Tschudin; Judith Alder; Stephanie Hendriksen; Johannes Bitzer; Karoline Aebi Popp; Rosanna Zanetti; Irene Hösli; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Verena Geissbühler
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.901

10.  Cesarean sections. Associated factors and frequency at King Abdulaziz Medical City in the Central Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Anwar E Ahmed; Rouzait S Mohammad
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request among Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Dipty Shrestha; Rachana Saha; Shilpi Mahato
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.406

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.