Literature DB >> 26249251

Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Ioannis Mylonas1, Klaus Friese.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of cesarean section have risen around the world in recent years. Accordingly, much effort is being made worldwide to understand this trend and to counteract it effectively. A number of factors have been found to make it more likely that a cesarean section will be chosen, but the risks cannot yet be clearly defined.
METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed, Scopus, and DIMDI databases, as well as on media communications, analyses by the German Federal Statistical Office, and guidelines of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF).
RESULTS: The increased rates of cesarean section are thought to be due mainly to changed risk profiles both for expectant mothers and for their yet unborn children, as well as an increase in cesarean section by maternal request. In 1991, 15.3% of all newborn babies in Germany were delivered by cesarean section; by 2012, the corresponding figure was 31.7%, despite the fact that a medical indication was present in less than 10% of all cases. This development may perhaps be explained by an increasing tendency toward risk avoidance, by risk-adapted obstetric practice, and increasing media attention. The intraoperative and postoperative risks of cesarean section must be considered, along with complications potentially affecting subsequent pregnancies.
CONCLUSION: Scientific advances, social and cultural changes, and medicolegal considerations seem to be the main reasons for the increased acceptibility of cesarean sections. Cesarean section is, however, associated with increased risks to both mother and child. It should only be performed when it is clearly advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26249251      PMCID: PMC4555060          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  135 in total

1.  Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Suspected macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?

Authors:  J S Cohain
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ravi M Patel; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  First-time mothers' wish for a planned caesarean section: deeply rooted emotions.

Authors:  M Sahlin; A-K Carlander-Klint; I Hildingsson; I Wiklund
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Breastfeeding rates and duration in Germany: a Bavarian cohort study.

Authors:  Martina Kohlhuber; Barbara Rebhan; Ursula Schwegler; Berthold Koletzko; Hermann Fromme
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study was to Estimate the Prevalence of the Early Initiation of and Exclusive Breast Feeding in the Rural Health Training Centre of a Medical College in Tamilnadu, South India.

Authors:  H Gladius Jennifer; K Muthukumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11

8.  Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term.

Authors:  V M Allen; C M O'Connell; R M Liston; T F Baskett
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.

Authors:  Katri Nieminen; Olof Stephansson; Elsa Lena Ryding
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 10.  Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.

Authors:  David M Haas; Sarah Morgan; Karenrose Contreras
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-09
View more
  64 in total

1.  Relaparotomy post-cesarean delivery: characteristics and risk factors.

Authors:  Alina Weissmann-Brenner; Eran Barzilay; Raanan Meyer; Gabriel Levin; Danielle Harmatz; Amal Alakeli; Noam Domniz; Israel Yoles
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  [Operative treatment in orthopedics and trauma surgery : Are more operations carried out in Germany?]

Authors:  P Garcia; C Domnick; G Lodde; M J Raschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The Rates and Medical Necessity of Cesarean Delivery in the Era of the Two-Child Policy in Hubei and Gansu Provinces, China.

Authors:  Zijun Liao; Yubo Zhou; Hongtian Li; Cheng Wang; Dunjin Chen; Jianmeng Liu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Stacey A Missmer; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Legal Situation.

Authors:  Roland M Uphoff
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Where Are the Advantages Mentioned?

Authors:  Martina Lenzen-Schulte
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Need for Innovations.

Authors:  Sabine Striebich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  An Act of Unpredictability.

Authors:  Wolf Lütjez
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  In Reply.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Substantial Advantages for Older Primiparae.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.