Literature DB >> 19747267

Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.

Stephen J Robson1, Woo Syong Tan, Adebayo Adeyemi, Keith B G Dear.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of cesarean section in Australia now exceeds 30 percent, and evidence from population studies indicates that maternal requests for elective cesarean delivery might make an important contribution. The objective of this study was to explore the rate of such deliveries in Australia, in the absence of a formal investigation.
METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to all 1,239 specialist obstetricians and 317 obstetric specialty trainees in Australia. Specialists were asked the number of elective cesarean deliveries they performed in 2006 that satisfied the National Institutes of Health definition of maternal request cesarean delivery. Trainees were asked whether they intended to agree to maternal requests for cesarean section in their future specialist practice.
RESULTS: The response rate from specialists was 98.6 percent, and from trainees was 81 percent. To account for possibility of multiple submissions, we performed two analyses: one using all responses, the other after removing 297 surveys in the second mail-out that were identical to surveys received from the first mail-out (n = 735). Proportions were similar in both groups. We estimated that between 8,553 and 12,434 maternal request cesarean sections were performed in Australia in 2006, representing at least 17 percent of all elective cesarean sections, and slightly more than 3 percent of all births.
CONCLUSION: Maternal request is an important contributor to cesarean section rates in Australia.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19747267     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  24 in total

1.  The cesarean decision survey.

Authors:  Denise M Puia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

2.  First-Time Mothers' Experiences of a Planned Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  Denise Puia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Neonatal complications in public and private patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Sarah Stock; Fatima Haggar; Geoffrey Hammond; Amanda T Langridge; David B Preen; Nick De Klerk; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Promotion of Pre-natal Education Courses Is Associated With Reducing the Rates of Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yunhui Tang; Jing Gao; Liping Sun; Yifei Gao; Fang Guo; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28

7.  Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Anna Kemp; Fatima A Haggar; Rachael E Moorin; Anthony S Gunnell; David B Preen; Fiona J Stanley; C D'Arcy J Holman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; Pilar Montilla; Elisa Scolaro; Armando Seuc; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Francesca Merzagora; Gian Paolo Donzelli; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Microeconomic surplus in health care: applied economic theory in health care in four European countries.

Authors:  S Walzer; M Nuijten; C Wiesner; K Kaier; P-O Johansson; S Oertel
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Fatima Haggar; Gavin Pereira; Helen Leonard; Nick de Klerk; Fiona J Stanley; Sarah Stock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.