Literature DB >> 18055756

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request.

.   

Abstract

Cesarean delivery on maternal request is defined as a primary cesarean delivery at maternal request in the absence of any medical or obstetric indication. A potential benefit of cesarean delivery on maternal request is decreased risk of hemorrhage for the mother. Potential risks of cesarean delivery on maternal request include a longer maternal hospital stay, an increased risk of respiratory problems for the baby, and greater complications in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine rupture and placental implantation problems. Cesarean delivery on maternal request should not be performed before gestational age of 39 weeks has been accurately determined unless there is documentation of lung maturity . Cesarean delivery on maternal request is not recommended for women desiring several children, given that the risks of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and the need for gravid hysterectomy increase with each cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055756     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291577.01569.4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  36 in total

1.  Should patients be entitled to cesarean section on demand?: No.

Authors:  Alain Demers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Should patients be entitled to cesarean section on demand?: Yes.

Authors:  Louise Duperron
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Dwight J Rouse; Merry Lynn Mann; Victoria Chapman; Waldemar A Carlo; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Delivery by caesarean section and risk of obesity in preschool age children: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susanna Y Huh; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Chloe A Zera; Janet W Rich Edwards; Emily Oken; Scott T Weiss; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes among laboring nulliparous women.

Authors:  Alan Thevenet N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; William A Grobman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  Melissa Lavecchia; Melanie Sabbah; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

7.  Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Laura B Attanasio; Joyce K Edmonds; John T Repke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Finding autonomy in birth.

Authors:  Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa Harris
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences.

Authors:  Margaret Olivia Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.