Literature DB >> 17308552

NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on cesarean delivery on maternal request. PARTICIPANTS: A non-DHHS, nonadvocate 18-member panel representing the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, preventive medicine, biometrics, family planning and reproductive physiology, nurse midwifery, anesthesiology, patient safety, epidemiology, pediatrics, perinatal medicine, urology, urogynecology, general nursing, inner city public health sciences, law, psychiatry, and health services research. In addition, 18 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience. EVIDENCE: Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience. CONFERENCE PROCESS: The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cesarean delivery without medical or obstetric indications is increasing in the United States, and a component of this increase is cesarean delivery on maternal request. Given the tools available, the magnitude of this component is difficult to quantify. There is insufficient evidence to evaluate fully the benefits and risks of cesarean delivery on maternal request as compared to planned vaginal delivery, and more research is needed. Until quality evidence becomes available, any decision to perform a cesarean delivery on maternal request should be carefully individualized and consistent with ethical principles. Given that the risks of placenta previa and accreta rise with each cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery on maternal request is not recommended for women desiring several children. Cesarean delivery on maternal request should not be performed prior to 39 weeks of gestation or without verification of lung maturity, because of the significant danger of neonatal respiratory complications. Maternal request for cesarean delivery should not be motivated by unavailability of effective pain management. Efforts must be made to assure availability of pain management services for all women. NIH or another appropriate Federal agency should establish and maintain a Web site to provide up-to-date information on the benefits and risks of all modes of delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17308552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements        ISSN: 1553-0779


  34 in total

1.  Clinical indications and determinants of the rise of cesarean section in three hospitals in rural China.

Authors:  Cheng Qin; Min Zhou; William M Callaghan; Samuel F Posner; Jun Zhang; Cynthia J Berg; Gengli Zhao
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

2.  Factors Associated with Nipple Lesions in Puerperae.

Authors:  Taciana Maia de Sousa; Luana Caroline Dos Santos; Érika Freitas Peixoto; Leonardo Motta Costa Lopes; Luiza Barroso de Andrade; Marcelo Cançado Frois; Michelle Amanda Santiago; Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.165

3.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Torres; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Neonatal morbidity and mortality after elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Mark Klebanoff
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Diane Korb; François Goffinet; Aurélien Seco; Sylvie Chevret; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

8.  Predictors of postpartum sexual activity and function in a diverse population of women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Sanae Nakagawa; Kathryn Houston; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  Finding autonomy in birth.

Authors:  Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa Harris
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.898

10.  Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.

Authors:  Rahim Ostovar; Arash Rashidian; Abolghasem Pourreza; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Sedigheh Hantooshzadeh; Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili; Mahmood Mahmoudi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.