Literature DB >> 31367194

A closer look at the conventional Winston-Lutz test: Analysis in terms of dose.

Juan-Francisco Calvo-Ortega1,2, Sandra Moragues-Femenía1,2, Coral Laosa-Bello1,2, Sol San José-Maderuelo1,2, Joan Casals-Farran1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether the target-isocenter deviations reported by a conventional Winston-Lutz (WL) test actually reflect the shifts of the measured prescription isodose line with respect to the target.
BACKGROUND: A conventional WL test uses a metallic ball as a target that aims at several fields. But this test does not report information on the accuracy of the delivery in terms of dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A conventional WL test using a metallic pointer as a target (Pointer-WL test) has been recreated in the Eclipse treatment planning system over an acrylic phantom containing a radiochromic film (Dose-WL test). After Dose-WL test delivery, the shift of the 80% prescription isodose line with respect to the target center (d80%-center) was measured using film dosimetry. The Pointer-WL and Dose-WL tests were performed in 10 different sessions. The isocenter deviation reported by the Pointer-WL test was compared to the d80%-center vector, according to the three patient's directions (Left-Right or LR; Anterior-Posterior or AP; and Superior-Inferior or SI).
RESULTS: The deviations (mean ± SD) found for the Dose-WL tests (LR: 0.5 ± 0.4 mm; AP: 0.5 ± 0.4 mm; SI: 0.6 ± 0.2 mm) were in most cases less than 1 mm, and they were significantly smaller (all p < 0.05) than the maximum deviations reported by the Pointer-WL tests (LR: 1.3 ± 0.3 mm; AP: 1.2 ± 0.4 mm; SI: 1.1 ± 0.3 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The Dose-WL test described in this study allows estimating the spatial accuracy of the prescription isodose line.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiochromic; SRS; Winston-Lutz

Year:  2019        PMID: 31367194      PMCID: PMC6651855          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  12 in total

1.  Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Dirk Verellen; Guy Soete; Nadine Linthout; Swana Van Acker; Patsy De Roover; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Jan Van de Steene; Guy Storme
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Linac radiosurgery as a tool in neurosurgery.

Authors:  R Deinsberger; J Tidstrand
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Accuracy and feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic radiosurgery setup.

Authors:  Jenghwa Chang; Kamil M Yenice; Ashwatha Narayana; Philip H Gutin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain.

Authors:  L LEKSELL
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1951-12-13

5.  Delivered Dose Distribution Visualized Directly With Onboard kV-CBCT: Proof of Principle.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Jaclyn Carroll; Michael Trager; Suk Whan Yoon; Jacob Kodra; Evan Maynard; Michelle Hilts; Mark Oldham; Andrew Jirasek
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Evaluation of the setup margins for cone beam computed tomography-guided cranial radiosurgery: A phantom study.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Calvo Ortega; Wouter Wunderink; David Delgado; Sandra Moragues; Miquel Pozo; Joan Casals
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.482

7.  Feasibility of an online adaptive replanning method for cranial frameless intensity-modulated radiosurgery.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Calvo; Sol San José; Lluís Garrido; Enrique Puertas; Sandra Moragues; Miquel Pozo; Joan Casals
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Three independent one-dimensional margins for single-fraction frameless stereotactic radiosurgery brain cases using CBCT.

Authors:  Qinghui Zhang; Maria F Chan; Chandra Burman; Yulin Song; Mutian Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Whole-procedural radiological accuracy for delivering multi-session gamma knife radiosurgery with a relocatable frame system.

Authors:  Lijun Ma; Dilini Pinnaduwage; Michael McDermott; Penny K Sneed
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31

10.  Evaluation and mitigation of potential errors in radiochromic film dosimetry due to film curvature at scanning.

Authors:  Antony L Palmer; David A Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simple quality assurance based on filtered back projection for geometrical/irradiation accuracy in single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Shun Kurata; Yasunori Saito; Shuta Ogawa; Keisuke Yasui
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-10-19

2.  Comparison of three different phantoms used for Winston-Lutz test with Artiscan software.

Authors:  Hubert Szweda; Kinga Graczyk; Dawid Radomiak; Krzysztof Matuszewski; Bartosz Pawałowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-03-04

3.  Verification of stereotactic radiosurgery plans for multiple brain metastases using a virtual phantom-based procedure.

Authors:  Juan-Francisco Calvo-Ortega; Peter B Greer; Sandra Moragues-Femenía; Miguel Pozo-Massó; Joan Casals-Farran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Intra-Fraction Motion Management for Radiosurgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Experience, Imaging Frequency, and Motion Analysis.

Authors:  Nzhde Agazaryan; Stephen Tenn; Nader Pouratian; Tania Kaprealian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.