Literature DB >> 26994824

Evaluation of the setup margins for cone beam computed tomography-guided cranial radiosurgery: A phantom study.

Juan Francisco Calvo Ortega1, Wouter Wunderink2, David Delgado3, Sandra Moragues3, Miquel Pozo3, Joan Casals3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the setup margins from the clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments guided by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). We designed an end-to-end (E2E) test using a skull phantom with an embedded 6mm tungsten ball (target). A noncoplanar plan was computed (E2E plan) to irradiate the target. The CBCT-guided positioning of the skull phantom on the linac was performed. Megavoltage portal images were acquired after 15 independent deliveries of the E2E plan. The displacement 2-dimensional (2D) vector between the centers of the square field and the ball target on each portal image was used to quantify the isocenter accuracy. Geometrical margins on each patient׳s direction (left-right or LR, anterior-posterior or AP, superior-inferior or SI) were calculated. Dosimetric validation of the margins was performed in 5 real SRS cases: 3-dimesional (3D) isocenter deviations were mimicked, and changes in CTV dose coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) dosage were analyzed. The CTV-PTV margins of 1.1mm in LR direction, and 0.7mm in AP and SI directions were derived from the E2E tests. The dosimetric analysis revealed that a 1-mm uniform margin was sufficient to ensure the CTV dose coverage, without compromising the OAR dose tolerances. The effect of isocenter uncertainty has been estimated to be 1mm in our CBCT-guided SRS approach.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; CTV; Isocenter; Margin; SRS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994824     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  4 in total

1.  A closer look at the conventional Winston-Lutz test: Analysis in terms of dose.

Authors:  Juan-Francisco Calvo-Ortega; Sandra Moragues-Femenía; Coral Laosa-Bello; Sol San José-Maderuelo; Joan Casals-Farran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-07-18

2.  Gamma Knife and volumetric modulated arc therapy stereotactic radiosurgery plan quality and OAR sparing comparison for pituitary adenomas and vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Salim Balik; Samuel Chao; Gennady Neyman
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

3.  Impact of patient positioning uncertainty in noncoplanar intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Masataka Oita; Shinichiro Inomata; Toshiaki Fuse; Yuichi Akino; Kohei Shimomura
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Analytical setup margin for spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy based on measured errors.

Authors:  Audrey Copeland; Addie Barron; Jonas Fontenot
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.