Laura R Hopson1, Michele L Dorfsman2, Jeremy Branzetti3, Michael A Gisondi4, Danielle Hart5, Jaime Jordan6, James A Cranford7, Sarah R Williams8, Linda Regan9. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor MI. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA. 3. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine New York University School of Medicine New York NY. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Minnesota Medical School St. Paul MN. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA. 7. Department of Psychiatry University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Association of American Medical Colleges Standardized Video Interview (SVI) was recently added as a component of emergency medicine (EM) residency applications to provide additional information about interpersonal communication skills (ICS) and knowledge of professionalism (PROF) behaviors. Our objective was to ascertain the correlation between the SVI and residency interviewer assessments of PROF and ICS. Secondary objectives included examination of 1) inter- and intrainstitutional assessments of ICS and PROF, 2) correlation of SVI scores with rank order list (ROL) positions, and 3) the potential influence of gender on interview day assessments. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using prospectively collected data from seven EM residency programs during 2017 and 2018 using a standardized instrument. Correlations between interview day PROF/ICS scores and the SVI were tested. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the association of SVI and ROL position. Gender differences were assessed with independent-groups t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 1,264 interview-day encounters from 773 unique applicants resulted in 4,854 interviews conducted by 151 interviewers. Both PROF and ICS demonstrated a small positive correlation with the SVI score (r = 0.16 and r = 0.17, respectively). ROL position was associated with SVI score (p < 0.001), with mean SVI scores for top-, middle-, and bottom-third applicants being 20.9, 20.5, and 19.8, respectively. No group differences with gender were identified on assessments of PROF or ICS. CONCLUSIONS: Interview assessments of PROF and ICS have a small, positive correlation with SVI scores. These residency selection tools may be measuring related, but not redundant, applicant characteristics. We did not identify gender differences in interview assessments.
OBJECTIVES: The Association of American Medical Colleges Standardized Video Interview (SVI) was recently added as a component of emergency medicine (EM) residency applications to provide additional information about interpersonal communication skills (ICS) and knowledge of professionalism (PROF) behaviors. Our objective was to ascertain the correlation between the SVI and residency interviewer assessments of PROF and ICS. Secondary objectives included examination of 1) inter- and intrainstitutional assessments of ICS and PROF, 2) correlation of SVI scores with rank order list (ROL) positions, and 3) the potential influence of gender on interview day assessments. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using prospectively collected data from seven EM residency programs during 2017 and 2018 using a standardized instrument. Correlations between interview day PROF/ICS scores and the SVI were tested. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the association of SVI and ROL position. Gender differences were assessed with independent-groups t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 1,264 interview-day encounters from 773 unique applicants resulted in 4,854 interviews conducted by 151 interviewers. Both PROF and ICS demonstrated a small positive correlation with the SVI score (r = 0.16 and r = 0.17, respectively). ROL position was associated with SVI score (p < 0.001), with mean SVI scores for top-, middle-, and bottom-third applicants being 20.9, 20.5, and 19.8, respectively. No group differences with gender were identified on assessments of PROF or ICS. CONCLUSIONS: Interview assessments of PROF and ICS have a small, positive correlation with SVI scores. These residency selection tools may be measuring related, but not redundant, applicant characteristics. We did not identify gender differences in interview assessments.
Authors: Denise M Dupras; Randall S Edson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Robert H Hopkins; Furman S McDonald Journal: Am J Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Maxine A Papadakis; Arianne Teherani; Mary A Banach; Timothy R Knettler; Susan L Rattner; David T Stern; J Jon Veloski; Carol S Hodgson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mounir J Haurani; I Rubinfeld; S Rao; J Beaubien; J L Musial; A Parker; C Reickert; A Raafat; A Shepard Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Maxine A Papadakis; Gerald K Arnold; Linda L Blank; Eric S Holmboe; Rebecca S Lipner Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M J B Govaerts; L W T Schuwirth; C P M Van der Vleuten; A M M Muijtjens Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 3.853