Literature DB >> 31360819

Comparison of the Standardized Video Interview and Interview Assessments of Professionalism and Interpersonal Communication Skills in Emergency Medicine.

Laura R Hopson1, Michele L Dorfsman2, Jeremy Branzetti3, Michael A Gisondi4, Danielle Hart5, Jaime Jordan6, James A Cranford7, Sarah R Williams8, Linda Regan9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Association of American Medical Colleges Standardized Video Interview (SVI) was recently added as a component of emergency medicine (EM) residency applications to provide additional information about interpersonal communication skills (ICS) and knowledge of professionalism (PROF) behaviors. Our objective was to ascertain the correlation between the SVI and residency interviewer assessments of PROF and ICS. Secondary objectives included examination of 1) inter- and intrainstitutional assessments of ICS and PROF, 2) correlation of SVI scores with rank order list (ROL) positions, and 3) the potential influence of gender on interview day assessments.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study using prospectively collected data from seven EM residency programs during 2017 and 2018 using a standardized instrument. Correlations between interview day PROF/ICS scores and the SVI were tested. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the association of SVI and ROL position. Gender differences were assessed with independent-groups t-tests.
RESULTS: A total of 1,264 interview-day encounters from 773 unique applicants resulted in 4,854 interviews conducted by 151 interviewers. Both PROF and ICS demonstrated a small positive correlation with the SVI score (r = 0.16 and r = 0.17, respectively). ROL position was associated with SVI score (p < 0.001), with mean SVI scores for top-, middle-, and bottom-third applicants being 20.9, 20.5, and 19.8, respectively. No group differences with gender were identified on assessments of PROF or ICS.
CONCLUSIONS: Interview assessments of PROF and ICS have a small, positive correlation with SVI scores. These residency selection tools may be measuring related, but not redundant, applicant characteristics. We did not identify gender differences in interview assessments.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31360819      PMCID: PMC6637001          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  25 in total

1.  Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board.

Authors:  Maxine A Papadakis; Carol S Hodgson; Arianne Teherani; Neal D Kohatsu
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people.

Authors:  Jim Crossley; Brian Jolly
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  "Problem residents": prevalence, problems and remediation in the era of core competencies.

Authors:  Denise M Dupras; Randall S Edson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Robert H Hopkins; Furman S McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Medical malpractice: managing the risk.

Authors:  R B Vukmir
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2004

5.  Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school.

Authors:  Maxine A Papadakis; Arianne Teherani; Mary A Banach; Timothy R Knettler; Susan L Rattner; David T Stern; J Jon Veloski; Carol S Hodgson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Jocelyn Chertoff; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Are the communication and professionalism competencies the new critical values in a resident's global evaluation process?

Authors:  Mounir J Haurani; I Rubinfeld; S Rao; J Beaubien; J L Musial; A Parker; C Reickert; A Raafat; A Shepard
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.

Authors:  Alison D Bullock; Andrew Hassell; Wolfgang A Markham; David W Wall; Andrew B Whitehouse
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards.

Authors:  Maxine A Papadakis; Gerald K Arnold; Linda L Blank; Eric S Holmboe; Rebecca S Lipner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise.

Authors:  M J B Govaerts; L W T Schuwirth; C P M Van der Vleuten; A M M Muijtjens
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.853

View more
  2 in total

1.  Systematic review of specialist selection methods with implications for diversity in the medical workforce.

Authors:  Andrew James Amos; Kyungmi Lee; Tarun Sen Gupta; Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 2.  Video-based interviewing in medicine: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rajajee Selvam; Richard Hu; Reilly Musselman; Isabelle Raiche; Daniel I McIsaac; Husein Moloo
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.