Literature DB >> 31329347

Magnetic Resonance Elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE.

Deep Gandhi1,2, Prateek Kalra2, Brian Raterman2, Xiaokui Mo3, Huiming Dong1,2, Arunark Kolipaka1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is 1) to demonstrate reproducibility of spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to estimate kidney stiffness; and 2) to compare SE-EPI MRE and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE-derived stiffness estimations in various anatomical regions of the kidney. Kidney MRE was performed on 33 healthy subjects (8 for SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and 25 for comparison with GRE MRE; age range: 22-66 years) in a 3 T MRI scanner. To demonstrate SE-EPI MRE reproducibility, subjects were scanned for the first scan and then asked to leave the scan room and repositioned again for the second (repeat) scan. Similar set-up was used for GRE MRE as well. The displacement data was then processed to obtain overall stiffness estimates of the kidney. Concordance correlation analyses were performed to determine SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and agreement between GRE MRE and SE-EPI MRE derived stiffness. A high concordance correlation (ρc  = 0.95; p-value<0.0001) was obtained for SE-EPI MRE reproducibility. Good concordance correlation was observed (ρc  = 0.84; p < 0.0001 for both kidneys, ρc  = 0.91; p < 0.0001 for right kidney and ρc  = 0.78; p < 0.0001 for left kidney) between GRE MRE and SE-EPI MRE derived stiffness measurements. Paired t-test results showed that stiffness value of medulla was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater than cortex using SE-EPI MRE as well as GRE MRE. SE-EPI MRE was reproducible and good agreement was observed in MRE-derived stiffness measurements obtained using SE-EPI and GRE sequences. Therefore, SE-EPI can be used for kidney MRE applications.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR Elastography of kidneys; kidney MRE; kidney stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31329347      PMCID: PMC6817380          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  37 in total

1.  MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  Ralph Sinkus; Katja Siegmann; Tanja Xydeas; Mickael Tanter; Claus Claussen; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Renal Fibrosis.

Authors:  Jia Li; Changlong An; Lei Kang; William E Mitch; Yanlin Wang
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Rapid acquisition technique for MR elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Suresh K Chamarthi; Brian Raterman; Ria Mazumder; Anthony Michaels; Veeral M Oza; James Hanje; Bradley Bolster; Ning Jin; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  MR elastography of the in vivo abdominal aorta: a feasibility study for comparing aortic stiffness between hypertensives and normotensives.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; David Woodrum; Philip A Araoz; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Could MRI Be Used To Image Kidney Fibrosis? A Review of Recent Advances and Remaining Barriers.

Authors:  General Leung; Anish Kirpalani; Stephen G Szeto; Maya Deeb; Warren Foltz; Craig A Simmons; Darren A Yuen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Tomoelastography of the native kidney: Regional variation and physiological effects on in vivo renal stiffness.

Authors:  Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia; Markus Grossmann; Sophia Theresa Lang; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Florian Dittmann; Bernd Hamm; Jürgen Braun; Jing Guo; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Evaluation of renal parenchymal disease in a rat model with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Nihar S Shah; Scott A Kruse; Donna J Lager; Gerard Farell-Baril; John C Lieske; Bernard F King; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the pancreas: Measurement reproducibility and relationship with age.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Samuel Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Zarine Shah; Phil A Hart; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  4 in total

1.  MR Elastography of the Abdomen: Experimental Protocols.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Meng Yin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.

Authors:  Megan Co; Huiming Dong; Daniel J Boulter; Xuan V Nguyen; Safdar N Khan; Brian Raterman; Brett Klamer; Arunark Kolipaka; Benjamin A Walter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.119

3.  Multiparametric quantitative renal MRI in children and young adults: comparison between healthy individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Stefanie W Benoit; Deep B Gandhi; Andrew T Trout; Jean A Tkach; Katherine VandenHeuvel; Prasad Devarajan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain.

Authors:  Lucy V Hiscox; Matthew D J McGarry; Hillary Schwarb; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ryan T Pohlig; Neil Roberts; Graham R Huesmann; Agnieszka Z Burzynska; Bradley P Sutton; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey; Keith D Paulsen; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.