Literature DB >> 17969009

MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Ralph Sinkus1, Katja Siegmann, Tanja Xydeas, Mickael Tanter, Claus Claussen, Mathias Fink.   

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis is to explore the potential diagnostic gain provided by the viscoelastic shear properties of breast lesions for the improvement of the specificity of contrast enhanced dynamic MR mammography (MRM). The assessment of viscoelastic properties is done via dynamic MR elastography (MRE) and it is demonstrated that the complex shear modulus of in vivo breast tissue follows within the frequency range of clinical MRE a power law behavior. Taking benefit of this frequency behavior, data are interpreted in the framework of the exact model for wave propagation satisfying the causality principle. This allows to obtain the exponent of the frequency power law from the complex shear modulus at one single frequency which is validated experimentally. Thereby, scan time is drastically reduced. It is observed that malignant tumors obtain larger exponents of the power law than benign tumors indicating a more liquid-like behavior. The combination of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categorization obtained via MRM with viscoelastic information leads to a substantial rise in specificity. Analysis of 39 malignant and 29 benign lesions shows a significant diagnostic gain with an increase of about 20% in specificity at 100% sensitivity. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17969009     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  97 in total

1.  Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) for Tumor Imaging and Treatment Monitoring.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Caroline Maleke; Jonathan Vappou
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

2.  Estimating material viscoelastic properties based on surface wave measurements: a comparison of techniques and modeling assumptions.

Authors:  Thomas J Royston; Zoujun Dai; Rajesh Chaunsali; Yifei Liu; Ying Peng; Richard L Magin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Adam J Pattison; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Shear wave speed recovery in sonoelastography using crawling wave data.

Authors:  Kui Lin; Joyce McLaughlin; Daniel Renzi; Ashley Thomas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Yogesh K Mariappan; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

Review 6.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

7.  pH-induced contrast in viscoelasticity imaging of biopolymers.

Authors:  R D Yapp; M F Insana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Methodology development for three-dimensional MR-guided near infrared spectroscopy of breast tumors.

Authors:  Colin M Carpenter; Subhadra Srinivasan; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  Abdominal magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-04

10.  MR-guided transcranial brain HIFU in small animal models.

Authors:  B Larrat; M Pernot; J-F Aubry; E Dervishi; R Sinkus; D Seilhean; Y Marie; A-L Boch; M Fink; M Tanter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.