Megan Co1, Huiming Dong2, Daniel J Boulter2, Xuan V Nguyen2, Safdar N Khan3, Brian Raterman2, Brett Klamer4, Arunark Kolipaka1,2, Benjamin A Walter1,2,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 4. Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 5. Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique that can noninvasively assess the shear properties of the intervertebral disc (IVD). Unlike the standard gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE technique, a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence has the potential to improve imaging efficiency and patient compliance. PURPOSE: To validate the use of an SE-EPI sequence for MRE of the IVD compared against the standard GRE sequence. STUDY TYPE: Cross-over. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (15 males and 13 females, age range: 19-55). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; GRE, SE-EPI with breath holds (SE-EPI-BH) and SE-EPI with free breathing (SE-EPI-FB) MRE sequences. ASSESSMENT: MRE-derived shear stiffnesses were calculated via principal frequency analysis. SE-EPI derived shear stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratios (OSS-SNR) were compared against those derived using the GRE sequence. The reproducibility and repeatability of SE-EPI stiffness measurements were determined. Shear stiffness was evaluated in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) regions of the disc. Scan times between sequences were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linear mixed models, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Good correlation was observed between shear stiffnesses derived from the SE-EPI sequences with those derived from the GRE sequence with CCC values greater than 0.73 and 0.78 for the NP and AF regions, respectively. OSS-SNR was not significantly different between GRE and SE-EPI sequences (P > 0.05). SE-EPI sequences generated highly reproducible and repeatable stiffness measurements with CCC values greater than 0.97 in the NP and AF regions and reduced scan time by at least 51% compared to GRE. SE-EPI-BH and SE-EPI-FB stiffness measurements were similar with CCC values greater than 0.98 for both regions. DATA CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-based MRE-derived stiffnesses were highly reproducible and repeatable and correlated with current standard GRE MRE-derived stiffness estimates while reducing scan times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique that can noninvasively assess the shear properties of the intervertebral disc (IVD). Unlike the standard gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE technique, a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence has the potential to improve imaging efficiency and patient compliance. PURPOSE: To validate the use of an SE-EPI sequence for MRE of the IVD compared against the standard GRE sequence. STUDY TYPE: Cross-over. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (15 males and 13 females, age range: 19-55). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; GRE, SE-EPI with breath holds (SE-EPI-BH) and SE-EPI with free breathing (SE-EPI-FB) MRE sequences. ASSESSMENT: MRE-derived shear stiffnesses were calculated via principal frequency analysis. SE-EPI derived shear stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratios (OSS-SNR) were compared against those derived using the GRE sequence. The reproducibility and repeatability of SE-EPI stiffness measurements were determined. Shear stiffness was evaluated in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) regions of the disc. Scan times between sequences were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linear mixed models, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Good correlation was observed between shear stiffnesses derived from the SE-EPI sequences with those derived from the GRE sequence with CCC values greater than 0.73 and 0.78 for the NP and AF regions, respectively. OSS-SNR was not significantly different between GRE and SE-EPI sequences (P > 0.05). SE-EPI sequences generated highly reproducible and repeatable stiffness measurements with CCC values greater than 0.97 in the NP and AF regions and reduced scan time by at least 51% compared to GRE. SE-EPI-BH and SE-EPI-FB stiffness measurements were similar with CCC values greater than 0.98 for both regions. DATA CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-based MRE-derived stiffnesses were highly reproducible and repeatable and correlated with current standard GRE MRE-derived stiffness estimates while reducing scan times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Authors: Suresh K Chamarthi; Brian Raterman; Ria Mazumder; Anthony Michaels; Veeral M Oza; James Hanje; Bradley Bolster; Ning Jin; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ephraim I Ben-Abraham; Jun Chen; Joel P Felmlee; Phil Rossman; Armando Manduca; Kai-Nan An; Richard L Ehman Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Kenneth M C Cheung; Jaro Karppinen; Danny Chan; Daniel W H Ho; You-Qiang Song; Pak Sham; Kathryn S E Cheah; John C Y Leong; Keith D K Luk Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Huiming Dong; Ning Jin; Stephan Kannengiesser; Brian Raterman; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Deborah J Gorth; Robert L Mauck; Joseph A Chiaro; Bhavana Mohanraj; Nader M Hebela; George R Dodge; Dawn M Elliott; Lachlan J Smith Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 5.156