Literature DB >> 34021649

High-contrast osteochondral junction imaging using a 3D dual adiabatic inversion recovery-prepared ultrashort echo time cones sequence.

Alecio F Lombardi1,2, Hyungseok Jang1, Zhao Wei1, Saeed Jerban1, Mark Wallace3, Koichi Masuda4, Ya-Jun Ma1.   

Abstract

While conventional MRI sequences cannot visualize tissues from the osteochondral junction (OCJ) due to these tissues' short transverse T2 /T2 * relaxations, ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences can overcome this limitation. A 2D UTE sequence with a dual adiabatic inversion recovery preparation (DIR-UTE) for selective imaging of short T2 tissues with high contrast has previously been developed, but high sensitivity to eddy currents and aliased out-of-slice excitation make it difficult to image the thin layer of the OCJ in vivo. Here, we combine the DIR scheme with a 3D UTE cones sequence for volumetric imaging of OCJ tissues in vivo, aiming to generate higher OCJ contrast compared with a recently developed single IR-prepared UTE sequence with a fat saturation module (IR-FS-UTE). All sequences were implemented on a 3-T clinical scanner. The DIR-UTE cones sequence combined a 3D UTE cones sequence with two narrow-band adiabatic IR preparation pulses centered on water and fat spectrum frequencies, respectively. The 3D DIR-UTE cones sequence was first applied to a phantom, then to the knees of four healthy volunteers and four patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis and compared with the IR-FS-UTE sequence. In both phantom and volunteer studies, the proposed DIR-UTE cones sequence showed much higher contrast for OCJ imaging than the IR-FS-UTE sequence did. The 3D DIR-UTE cones sequence showed a significantly higher contrast-to-noise ratio between the OCJ and subchondral bone fat (mean, standard deviation [SD]: 25.7 ± 2.3) and between the OCJ and superficial layers of cartilage (mean, SD: 22.2 ± 3.5) compared with the IR-FS-UTE sequence (mean, SD: 10.8 ± 2.5 and 16.3 ± 2.6, respectively). The 3D DIR-UTE cones sequence is feasible for imaging of the OCJ region of the knee in vivo and produces both high resolution and high contrast.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual adiabatic inversion recovery; osteochondral junction; ultrashort echo time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021649      PMCID: PMC8254801          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.478


  32 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; Peter D Gatehouse; Mark Bydder; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Accurate T1 mapping of short T2 tissues using a three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones actual flip angle imaging-variable repetition time (3D UTE-Cones AFI-VTR) method.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Xing Lu; Michael Carl; Yanchun Zhu; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Graeme M Bydder; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Ultrashort echo time MR imaging of osteochondral junction of the knee at 3 T: identification of anatomic structures contributing to signal intensity.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Jerry R Dwek; Richard Znamirowski; Sheronda M Statum; Juan C Hermida; Darryl D D'Lima; Robert L Sah; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Weighted subtraction in 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging for visualization of short T2 tissues of the knee.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Sungjun Kim; Ho-Taek Song; InSeong Kim; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  UTE MRI of the Osteochondral Junction.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Reni Biswas; Karen Chen; Eric Y Chang; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 6.  State of the Art: Imaging of Osteoarthritis-Revisited 2020.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Shadpour Demehri; Patrick Omoumi; Thomas M Link; Richard Kijowski; Simo Saarakkala; Michel D Crema; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  In Vivo Quantitative MR Imaging of Bound and Pore Water in Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Osteochondral alterations in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Sunita Suri; David A Walsh
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence.

Authors:  Michael Carl; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Whole-Brain Myelin Imaging Using 3D Double-Echo Sliding Inversion Recovery Ultrashort Echo Time (DESIRE UTE) MRI.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Jonathan Wong; Eric Y Chang; Jody Corey-Bloom; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 29.146

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative T2 and T1ρ mapping are sensitive to ischemic injury to the epiphyseal cartilage in an in vivo piglet model of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  A R Armstrong; S Bhave; E O Buko; K L Chase; F Tóth; C S Carlson; J M Ellermann; H K W Kim; C P Johnson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.507

Review 2.  Articular Cartilage Assessment Using Ultrashort Echo Time MRI: A Review.

Authors:  Amir Masoud Afsahi; Sam Sedaghat; Dina Moazamian; Ghazaleh Afsahi; Jiyo S Athertya; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  AcidoCEST-UTE MRI Reveals an Acidic Microenvironment in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alecio F Lombardi; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Saeed Jerban; Qingbo Tang; Adam C Searleman; Robert Scott Meyer; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.