| Literature DB >> 31315089 |
Yaojing Chen1,2, Chenlong Lv3, Xin Li1,2, Junying Zhang2,4, Kewei Chen5, Zhongwan Liu6, He Li2,4, Jialing Fan1,2, Ting Qin2, Liang Luo1, Zhanjun Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Education in people's early lives are positively related to their cognitive function, but its modulating effects on detailed cognition domains, its interaction with leisure activities and the associated brain changes have yet to be investigated. This report used data from 659 cognitively normal community dwelling elderly who completed neuropsychological tests, leisure activities measurement, and 78 of them underwent structural and diffusion MRI scans. We found that: (i) the highly educated elderly had a better cognitive functioning in multi-domains, higher frequencies of participation in knowledge-related leisure activities, and slower age-related reductions of executive function; (ii) the intellectual and social types of leisure activities mediated the association between education and multiple cognitive domains, including memory, language, attention and executive function; (iii) there was a significant age by education interaction on the gray matter volume of the anterior brain regions and white matter integrity; and (iv) the interaction between age and education affected cognition indirectly through white matter integrity analyzed using structural equation model. Overall, our results revealed that high education in early life served as a protective factor in aging that may help to postpone cognitive and brain reserve decline in cognitively normal aging.Entities:
Keywords: aging; brain reserve; cognition; education
Year: 2019 PMID: 31315089 PMCID: PMC6682517 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Demographic and neuropsychological tests of all participants.
| Num | 439 | 220 | — | — |
| Age | 63.59(7.22) | 67.25(6.87) | <0.001 | — |
| Gender(M/F) | 151/288 | 92/128 | 0.027 | — |
| Education(year) | 9.49(1.96) | 15.26(1.47) | <0.001 | — |
| APOE ε4 (+/-) | 67/372 | 35/185 | 0.820 | — |
| MMSE | 27.97(1.59) | 28.37(1.44) | <0.001 | 0.658 |
| AVLT-delay recall | 6.02(2.44) | 6.44(2.27) | <0.001 | 0.306 |
| AVLT-delay total | 31.47(8.72) | 33.00(8.33) | <0.001 | 0.451 |
| ROCF-Copy | 33.17(3.55) | 34.30(1.94) | <0.001 | 0.242 |
| ROCF-delay recall | 13.71(6.31) | 14.85(5.51) | <0.001 | 0.159 |
| CDT | 24.49(3.62) | 26.04(2.96) | <0.001 | 0.977 |
| CVFT | 45.22(8.34) | 48.39(7.78) | <0.001 | 0.702 |
| BNT | 23.10(3.64) | 24.57(3.01) | <0.001 | 0.332 |
| SDMT | 34.71(11.01) | 39.34(10.97) | <0.001 | 0.665 |
| Digit span | 7.33(1.31) | 7.86(1.19) | <0.001 | 0.217 |
| Backward digit span | 4.21(1.24) | 4.73(1.34) | <0.001 | 0.881 |
| TMT-A time (s) | 57.29(18.99) | 51.52(15.49) | <0.001 | 0.205 |
| TMT-B time (s) | 175.91(70.74) | 152.99(48.23) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| SCWT-A Time (s) | 27.77(6.82) | 25.60(5.47) | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| SCWT-B Time (s) | 37.49(8.58) | 37.49(23.65) | 0.468 | 0.409 |
| SCWT-C Time (s) | 74.54(18.24) | 73.35(23.93) | 0.002 | 0.121 |
| Intellectual activity | 60.53(21.97) | 70.93(22.84) | <0.001 | 0.810 |
| Physical activity | 52.0(17.80) | 56.42(18.96) | 0.004 | 0.278 |
| Social activity | 32.17(15.06) | 35.95(14.45) | <0.001 | 0.806 |
Values are mean±standard deviation or Nos. of participants.
MMSE=Mini-Mental Status Examination; AVLT=Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ROCF=Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test; CDT=Clock-Drawing Test; CVFT=Category Verbal Fluency Test; BNT=Boston Naming Test; SDMT=Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SCWT=Stroop Color and Word Test; TMT=Trail Making Test.
Figure 1The mediation model. The mediation model illustrating the direct effect of education on intellectual/social/ physical activity, the direct effect of education on TMT-B and SCWT-A performance, the direct effect of intellectual/social/ physical activity on TMT-B and SCWT-A performance and the mediating effect of intellectual/social/ physical activity on the association between educational levels and TMT-B/SCWT-A performance, as indicated by the path coefficients and the p values.
Figure 2The age×education effects on gray matter volume. (A) Maps of the significant age×education interaction on gray matter volume. A significant main effect of education on gray matter was also found (p<0.05, uncorrected). (B) Scatterplots illustrating the age×education interaction for ORBsupmed.L and ACG.L (q<0.05, FDR-corrected). Specifically, the plots were drawn to illustrate how the GM volume changes within the actual range of age. ORBsupmed.L=left medial orbital superior frontal gyrus; ACG.L=left anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyrus.
Figure 3The effect of age×education on white matter integrity. The fibers in red exhibited significant age×education interaction effects (p< 0.05), including the FA and MD of the forceps major, and the MD of the SLF.temporal part. The plots were drawn to illustrate how the white matter changes within the actual range of age. FA=fractional anisotropy; MD=mean diffusivity; SLF=superior longitudinal fasciculus.
Figure 4The structural equation modeling of the relation among white matter, grey matter and cognition. COG= Cognitive Tests; GM=gray matter; WM=white matter; ORB_L= left medial orbital superior frontal gyrus; ACG_L=left anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyrus; MD_SLF= the mean diffusivity of the SLF.temporal part; SCWT-A=Stroop Color and Word A Test; TMT-B=Trail Making B Test.