| Literature DB >> 31288779 |
Dong Jiang1, Ying-Fang Ao1, Chen Jiao1, Qin-Wei Guo1, Xing Xie1, Feng Zhao1, Nan Li2, Xiao-Xiao Wang2, Yue-Lin Hu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pretension of the viscoelastic graft by cyclic knee motion has been confirmed to decrease the graft creep and improve the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of cyclic knee motion on the elongation of the four-strand hamstring tendon autograft in situ and to explore the stable level cycle, in which the tendon length achieved a stable level.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Cyclic knee motion; Graft lengthening; Pretension
Year: 2019 PMID: 31288779 PMCID: PMC6615292 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2699-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Graft pretension procedure. The graft was tightened by a tensometer with the tension of 15 lb. Then the pretension was operated by repeated flexing and extending the knee joint between 0°(b) and 110° (a)
The elongation of 4 strand STG graft after repeated knee flexion
| 10 cycles | 20 cycles | 30 cycles | 40 cycles | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elongation (mm, %)a | ||||
| Mean | 3.00(3.6%) | 4.32(5.2%) | 4.81(5.8%) | 4.85(5.8%) |
| SD | 1.40(1.7%) | 1.52(1.9%) | 1.72(2.1%) | 1.77(2.2%) |
| Median | 3.0(3.4%) | 4.1(4.7%) | 5.2(5.6%) | 5.2(5.6%) |
| Min | 1.0(1.1%) | 2.1(2.0%) | 2.2(2.6%) | 2.2(2.6%) |
| Max | 7.2(8.8%) | 9.0(11.3%) | 9.8(12.5%) | 10.0(12.5%) |
| Elongation cases (%)b | 53(100%) | 46(86.8%) | 25(27.2%) | 2(3.8%) |
aThe elongation and the relative percentages to the IBT
bThe number and percentage of cases whose length changes after each 10 cycles
Fig. 2Relationship of elongation and the flexion cycle
Correlation analysis between graft elongation and patients’ parameters
| 10 cycles | 20 cycles | 30 cycles | 40 cycles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC |
| CC |
| CC |
| CC |
| |
| Age | 0.020 | 0.885 | 0.028 | 0.840 | 0.030 | 0.829 | 0.031 | 0.823 |
| Height | 0.014 | 0.919 | 0.07 | 0.616 | 0.057 | 0.688 | 0.075 | 0.593 |
| Body weight | 0.081 | 0.562 | 0.056 | 0.689 | 0.036 | 0.795 | 0.047 | 0.740 |
| Pre-op duration | 0.161 | 0.251 | 0.142 | 0.311 | 0.174 | 0.212 | 0.181 | 0.195 |
| Graft diameter | −0.117 | 0.404 | 0.002 | 0.991 | −0.011 | 0.936 | 0 | 0.982 |
| ST length | −0.023 | 0.868 | −0.040 | 0.776 | −0.134 | 0.337 | −0.13 | 0.364 |
| GT length | −0.006 | 0.966 | −0.030 | 0.832 | −0.108 | 0.441 | −0.11 | 0.434 |
| IBT length | 0.037 | 0.794 | 0.012 | 0.933 | −0.001 | 0.993 | −0.02 | 0.862 |
| Loop length | 0.061 | 0.662 | −0.039 | 0.784 | −0.014 | 0.921 | −0.01 | 0.962 |
CC correlation coefficient, ST semiteninous tendon, GT gracilis tendon, IBT intra-body tendon
Univariate analysis of stable level cycle with patients’ parameters
| Stable level cycle = 20( | Stable level cycle = 30 ( | t/z/χ2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 29.8 ± 11.4 | 28.5 ± 8.8 | 0.45 | 0.655 |
| Height(cm) | 174.0 ± 8.6 | 173.7 ± 9.0 | 0.137 | 0.891 |
| Body weight(kg) | 77.3 ± 13.5 | 75.6 ± 15.6 | 0.414 | 0.681 |
| ST length(cm) | 27.7 ± 3.5 | 26.5 ± 2.8 | 1.381 | 0.173 |
| GT length(cm) | 25.1 ± 3.5 | 24.0 ± 2.7 | 1.325 | 0.191 |
| IBT length(mm) | 85.0 ± 8.4 | 84.3 ± 7.6 | 0.325 | 0.746 |
| Endo-button loop(mm) | 23.0 ± 4.2 | 23.5 ± 4.9 | −0.35 | 0.728 |
| Pre-op duration(month) | 7.5(0.1–144.0) | 6.0(0.5–240.0) | −0.142 | 0.887 |
| Male (%) | 24(85.7%) | 17(73.9%) | 1.094 | 0.296 |
| Left side (%) | 14(50.0%) | 10(43.5%) | 0.216 | 0.642 |
| Graft diameter (%) | 5(17.9%) | 5(21.7%) | 0.121 | 0.728 |
ST semiteninous tendon, GT gracilis tendon, IBT intra-body tendon
Multivariate logistic regression of stable level cycle and patients’ parameters
| B | S.E. |
| OR | 95% OR CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower limit | uper limit | |||||
| Age | .014 | .038 | .704 | 1.015 | .942 | 1.093 |
| Height | .148 | .096 | .124 | 1.159 | .960 | 1.400 |
| Body weight | −.011 | .035 | .744 | .989 | .924 | 1.058 |
| ST length | −.143 | .216 | .507 | .866 | .567 | 1.323 |
| GT length | −.191 | .208 | .358 | .826 | .550 | 1.242 |
| IBT length | .015 | .059 | .803 | 1.015 | .904 | 1.139 |
| Endobutton loop | .018 | .092 | .843 | 1.018 | .850 | 1.219 |
| Pre-op duration | .004 | .008 | .583 | 1.004 | .989 | 1.020 |
| Gender (male) | 2.277 | 1.273 | .074 | 9.745 | .804 | 118.076 |
| Side (left) | .491 | .699 | .483 | 1.633 | .415 | 6.429 |
| Graft diameter | −.826 | 1.115 | .459 | .438 | .049 | 3.894 |
| Constant | −12.940 | 12.469 | .299 | .000 | ||
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ST semiteninous tendon, GT gracilis tendon, IBT intra-body tendon
Fig. 3Graft elongation of different gender patients