Literature DB >> 10937634

Mechanical behavior of two hamstring graft constructs for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

J Höher1, S U Scheffler, J D Withrow, G A Livesay, R E Debski, F H Fu, S L Woo.   

Abstract

We compared the mechanical behavior of two common hamstring graft constructs that are frequently used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament-Graft A: quadrupled semitendinosus tendon fixed with titanium button/polyester tape and suture/screw post, and Graft B: a double semitendinosus and double gracilis tendon fixed with a cross pin and two screws over washers. The experimental protocol used to evaluate each graft construct included stress relaxation (with and without preconditioning), cyclic loading, and a tensile load-to-failure test. The amount of stress relaxation without preconditioning was 60.6% for Graft A and 53.8% for Graft B. With preconditioning, it significantly decreased (p < 0.05) to 48.7 and 42.3%, respectively. Elongation of the graft construct in response to 100 cycles of loading (20-150 N) was 1.8 and 0.6% of the original length for Grafts A and B, respectively. However, after a series of five cyclic loading tests, the residual permanent elongation for each construct was 3.8 +/- 1.2 and 0.3 +/- 0.2 mm, a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two graft constructs. Further analysis found more than 90% of the permanent elongation in the proximal and distal regions of Graft A, which consisted of polyester tape tied to a titanium button (proximal) and sutures tied around a screw post (distal). The tensile load-to-failure tests also revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two graft constructs. Linear stiffness was 32 +/- 1 and 119 +/- 19 Nmm and ultimate load was 415 +/- 36 and 658 +/- 128 N for Grafts A and B, respectively. For Graft A, the polyester tape consistently failed; for Graft B, slippage or tearing from the washers was the mode of failure. We conclude that a quadruple-hamstring graft fixed over a cross pin proximally and with metal washers distally (Graft B) has less permanent elongation in response to cyclic loading and has structural properties superior to those of a graft construct that includes suture and tape material (Graft A). The large permanent elongation following repetitive loading of a graft construct with tape and suture material during the early postoperative period is of concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937634     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  23 in total

1.  Effects of graft pretensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Claude Guillard; Francois Lintz; Guillaume Anthony Odri; Denis Vogeli; Fabrice Colin; Sylvie Collon; Daniel Chappard; François Gouin; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests.

Authors:  Yasuharu Hiraga; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Harehiko Tsukada Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Modified Prusik knot versus whipstitch technique for soft tissue fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Franz Sebastian Kralinger; Rene El Attal; Wolfgang Hackl; Christian Haid
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Initial fixation strength of a hybrid technique for femoral ACL graft fixation.

Authors:  Andre Weimann; Thore Zantop; Mirco Herbort; Michael Strobel; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Elongation of simulated whipstitch post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial fixation after cyclic loading.

Authors:  Chadwick C Prodromos; Aaron Hecker; Brian Joyce; Susan Finkle; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jürgen Höher; Sven Scheffler; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Preparation techniques for all-inside ACL cortical button grafts: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Raul Mayr; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Martin Eichinger; Vinzenz Smekal; Werner Schmoelz; René Attal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Sebastian Giambartino; Michele Lauria; Michele Saporito; Vito Triolo; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-09-17

9.  Hamstrings tendon graft preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the WhipKnot™ soft tissue cinch technique.

Authors:  Amin Masoumiganjgah; Umesh Dhanjee; Tendai Mwaturura; Cameron Carmody
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-04-30

10.  Effect of suturing the femoral portion of a four-strand graft during an ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Giuseppe Pitarresi; Salvatore Moscadini; Giuseppe Marannano; Antonino Sanfilippo; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.