Literature DB >> 12966376

Effects of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a cadaver study.

Douglas Boylan1, Patrick E Greis, John R West, Kent N Bachus, Robert T Burks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tension degradation within hamstring grafts and anterior knee laxity were analyzed in a cadaveric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction model undergoing cyclic motion. It was hypothesized that suture fixation of a hamstring graft would lose tension during cycling initially and then stabilize, and that anterior knee laxity would increase as tension was lost. Hamstring grafts fixed under 3 different loads were evaluated to determine how initial graft tension affected knee laxity after cyclic motion. TYPE OF STUDY: Cadaveric biomechanical analysis.
METHODS: Eighteen pairs of fresh-frozen hamstring tendons were tested on 2 cadaveric knees undergoing ACL reconstruction. The hamstring pairs were separated equally and randomly into one of 3 tension groups: 68 N (15 lb), 45 N (10 lb), and 23 N (5 lb). The loads were applied to the graft at 30 degrees of flexion, and the grafts were secured to the tibia with a suture and post technique. The knee was then cycled 1,000 times using an Instron machine (Instron, Canton, MA) through a range of motion between 0 degrees to 90 degrees. Constant monitoring and recording of graft tension was performed. A KT-1000 (Medmetrics, San Diego, CA) was performed (1) on the intact knee, (2) after ACL excision, (3) after ACL reconstruction and initial graft fixation, and (4) at the completion of the 1,000 cycles. An analysis of variance test was used to evaluate data.
RESULTS: The tension within the grafts after 1,000 cycles decreased to 34.5 N (7.6 lb), 16.8 N (3.7 lb), and 15.4 N (3.4 lb) from the preloads of 68, 45, and 23 N, respectively (P <.05 in all cases). This represented an average decrease of 50.2% of the initial tension after 1,000 cycles. Manual-maximum KT testing of the intact knees was 5.8 +/- 0.3 mm, and after ACL excision was 13.2 +/- 0.9 mm. KT testing revealed 6.0 +/- 0.9 mm, 8.1 +/- 1.9 mm, and 8.9 +/- 1.1 mm of anterior translation after fixation in the tension groups of 68, 45, and 23 N, respectively. After 1,000 cycles, the translation increased to 7.8 +/- 1.0 mm, 10.5 +/- 1.9 mm, and 10.3 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that initial graft tension decreases with cyclic loading, resulting in increased knee laxity. To restore anterior translation to within 3 mm of the native ACL condition after cyclic loading, approximately 68 N of initial tension is required using this fixation technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966376     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00400-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  Pretensioning of quadruple flexor tendon grafts in two types of femoral fixation: quasi-randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Cezar Teruyuki Kawano; Patrícia Maria de Moraes Barros Fucs; Nilson Roberto Severino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Tibiofemoral compression force differences using laxity- and force-based initial graft tensioning techniques in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed cadaveric knee.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Mark F Brady; Michael P Bradley; Rahul Banerjee; Michael J Hulstyn; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  A biomechanical comparison of the Delta screw and RetroScrew tibial fixation on initial intra-articular graft tension.

Authors:  Peter C Rhee; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  High-load preconditioning of soft tissue grafts: an in vitro biomechanical bovine tendon model.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Jaglowski; Brady T Williams; Travis Lee Turnbull; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effect of fixation angle and graft tension in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Yusuke Sasaki; Shih-Sheng Chang; Masataka Fujii; Daisuke Araki; Junjun Zhu; Brandon Marshall; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  ACL double-bundle reconstruction with one tibial tunnel provides equal stability compared to two tibial tunnels.

Authors:  Björn Holger Drews; Andreas Martin Seitz; Jochen Huth; Gerhard Bauer; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Effect of suturing the femoral portion of a four-strand graft during an ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Giuseppe Pitarresi; Salvatore Moscadini; Giuseppe Marannano; Antonino Sanfilippo; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A comparison of the quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties of the human semitendinosus and gracilis tendons.

Authors:  Steven D Abramowitch; Xiaoyan Zhang; Molly Curran; Robert Kilger
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jong Keun Seon; Michal Kozanek; Luke S Oh; Thomas J Gill; Kenneth D Montgomery; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.