Literature DB >> 23868525

Second-look arthroscopic evaluation of chondral lesions after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.

Xi Gong1, Dong Jiang, Yong-Jian Wang, Jian Wang, Ying-Fang Ao, Jia-Kuo Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported to yield better joint stability than single-bundle (SB) reconstruction. Few studies have compared the 2 techniques with regard to postoperative articular cartilage changes. HYPOTHESIS: Less cartilage damage should occur in the short term after DB ACLR than after SB ACLR. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: The study included 52 patients (27 in the DB group and 25 in the SB group) with no chondral or meniscus injury at primary ACLR, as confirmed under arthroscopy. Four-strand and 6- to 8-strand hamstring autografts, respectively, were used for transtibial SB and 4-tunnel DB reconstruction. Each graft was fixed with an EndoButton bioabsorbable interference screw and a staple. Cartilage status at 6 identified regions was evaluated by second-look arthroscopy and the Outerbridge classification. Other assessments at final follow-up included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner and Lysholm scores, side-to-side difference on KT-2000 arthrometer, and range of motion.
RESULTS: The mean time from reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy was 18.2 and 17.3 months for the DB and SB groups, respectively. Both groups had cartilage lesions at the patellofemoral joint (patella, 9 vs 13; trochlea, 5 vs 12) and the medial compartment (1 vs 2). Significantly less severe lesions were found in the DB group than in the SB group (mean grade, 0.33 vs 0.96; P < .05). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of cartilage status at other regions, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, KT-2000 arthrometer anterior laxity, or range of motion.
CONCLUSION: Chondral lesions were found postoperatively in both DB and SB ACLR groups with hamstring autograft. The DB ALCR led to less cartilage damage at the femoral trochlea at short-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; cartilage; double-bundle reconstruction; second-look arthroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868525     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513496064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Factors Influencing the Progression of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage Damage After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Zhengzhao Li; Shishi Luo; Jiaxuan Zheng; Gang Zhou; Guangji Wang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 3.  [Research progress of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents].

Authors:  Zhiping Cheng; Zimu Mao; Jiakuo Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-15

4.  Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-Tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Simon Meier; Sufian S Ahmad; Harald Bonel; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Anna Krismer; Dimitrios Stergios Evangelopoulos
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Prediction of progression of damage to articular cartilage 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of aggrecan and type II collagen biomarkers in a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Yasumori Sobue; Toshihisa Kojima; Kazutoshi Kurokouchi; Shigeo Takahashi; Hiroaki Yoshida; Robin Poole; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction methods between reverse "Y" plasty reconstruction and traditional single-bundle technique-A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Weiping Li; Yang Song; Bin Song; Rui Yang; Tong Xing; Zhong Chen; Zhengzheng Zhang; Yi Ouyang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Passive anterior tibia translation in anterior cruciate ligament-injured, anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and healthy knees: a systematic review.

Authors:  M N J Keizer; E Otten
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-16

8.  The Role of Lateral Retinacular Release in Preventing Patellofemoral Malalignment in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ludwig Andre Pontoh; Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo; Erica Kholinne; Jessica Fiolin; Toto Suryo Efar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 9.  Risk factors of cartilage lesion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zirong Huang; Jiaming Cui; Mingjin Zhong; Zhenhan Deng; Kang Chen; Weimin Zhu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.