Jussi Toivonen1,2, Ileana Montoya Perez1,2, Parisa Movahedi1,2, Harri Merisaari1,2,3, Marko Pesola1, Pekka Taimen4, Peter J Boström5, Jonne Pohjankukka2, Aida Kiviniemi1,6, Tapio Pahikkala2, Hannu J Aronen1,6, Ivan Jambor1,7. 1. Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 2. Dept. of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 3. Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 4. Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku and Dept. of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 5. Dept. of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 6. Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 7. Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a classifier system for prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) Gleason score (GS) using radiomics and texture features of T2-weighted imaging (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquired using high b values, and T2-mapping (T2). METHODS: T2w, DWI (12 b values, 0-2000 s/mm2), and T2 data sets of 62 patients with histologically confirmed PCa were acquired at 3T using surface array coils. The DWI data sets were post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, while T2w was standardized to a common scale. Local statistics and 8 different radiomics/texture descriptors were utilized at different configurations to extract a total of 7105 unique per-tumor features. Regularized logistic regression with implicit feature selection and leave pair out cross validation was used to discriminate tumors with 3+3 vs >3+3 GS. RESULTS: In total, 100 PCa lesions were analysed, of those 20 and 80 had GS of 3+3 and >3+3, respectively. The best model performance was obtained by selecting the top 1% features of T2w, ADCm and K with ROC AUC of 0.88 (95% CI of 0.82-0.95). Features from T2 mapping provided little added value. The most useful texture features were based on the gray-level co-occurrence matrix, Gabor transform, and Zernike moments. CONCLUSION: Texture feature analysis of DWI, post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, and T2w demonstrated good classification performance for GS of PCa. In multisequence setting, the optimal radiomics based texture extraction methods and parameters differed between different image types.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a classifier system for prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) Gleason score (GS) using radiomics and texture features of T2-weighted imaging (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquired using high b values, and T2-mapping (T2). METHODS: T2w, DWI (12 b values, 0-2000 s/mm2), and T2 data sets of 62 patients with histologically confirmed PCa were acquired at 3T using surface array coils. The DWI data sets were post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, while T2w was standardized to a common scale. Local statistics and 8 different radiomics/texture descriptors were utilized at different configurations to extract a total of 7105 unique per-tumor features. Regularized logistic regression with implicit feature selection and leave pair out cross validation was used to discriminate tumors with 3+3 vs >3+3 GS. RESULTS: In total, 100 PCa lesions were analysed, of those 20 and 80 had GS of 3+3 and >3+3, respectively. The best model performance was obtained by selecting the top 1% features of T2w, ADCm and K with ROC AUC of 0.88 (95% CI of 0.82-0.95). Features from T2 mapping provided little added value. The most useful texture features were based on the gray-level co-occurrence matrix, Gabor transform, and Zernike moments. CONCLUSION: Texture feature analysis of DWI, post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, and T2w demonstrated good classification performance for GS of PCa. In multisequence setting, the optimal radiomics based texture extraction methods and parameters differed between different image types.
Authors: Robert V Mulkern; Agnieszka Szot Barnes; Steven J Haker; Yin P Hung; Frank J Rybicki; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Guillaume Lemaître; Robert Martí; Jordi Freixenet; Joan C Vilanova; Paul M Walker; Fabrice Meriaudeau Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Gerrit Draisma; Rob Boer; Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Ronald A M Damhuis; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Radu Rozenberg; Rebecca E Thornhill; Trevor A Flood; Shaheed W Hakim; Christopher Lim; Nicola Schieda Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Roger M Bourne; Colleen Bailey; Edward William Johnston; Hayley Pye; Susan Heavey; Hayley Whitaker; Bernard Siow; Alex Freeman; Greg L Shaw; Ashwin Sridhar; Thomy Mertzanidou; David J Hawkes; Daniel C Alexander; Shonit Punwani; Eleftheria Panagiotaki Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Rodrigo Delgadillo; John C Ford; Matthew C Abramowitz; Alan Dal Pra; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: William Rogers; Sithin Thulasi Seetha; Turkey A G Refaee; Relinde I Y Lieverse; Renée W Y Granzier; Abdalla Ibrahim; Simon A Keek; Sebastian Sanduleanu; Sergey P Primakov; Manon P L Beuque; Damiënne Marcus; Alexander M A van der Wiel; Fadila Zerka; Cary J G Oberije; Janita E van Timmeren; Henry C Woodruff; Philippe Lambin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Sérgio Augusto Santana Souza; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Allan Felipe Fattori Alves; Letícia Cotinguiba Silva; Maria Clara Korndorfer Medeiros; Danilo Leite Andrade; Athanase Billis; João Luiz Amaro; Daniel Lahan Martins; André Petean Trindade; José Ricardo Arruda Miranda; Diana Rodrigues Pina Journal: Phys Eng Sci Med Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: Sean D McGarry; John D Bukowy; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Allison K Lowman; Michael Brehler; Samuel Bobholz; Andrew Nencka; Alex Barrington; Kenneth Jacobsohn; Jackson Unteriner; Petar Duvnjak; Michael Griffin; Mark Hohenwalter; Tucker Keuter; Wei Huang; Tatjana Antic; Gladell Paner; Watchareepohn Palangmonthip; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-09-09