Literature DB >> 35325377

Multiple analyses suggests texture features can indicate the presence of tumor in the prostate tissue.

Sérgio Augusto Santana Souza1, Leonardo Oliveira Reis2, Allan Felipe Fattori Alves3, Letícia Cotinguiba Silva1, Maria Clara Korndorfer Medeiros4, Danilo Leite Andrade2, Athanase Billis5, João Luiz Amaro6, Daniel Lahan Martins7, André Petean Trindade8, José Ricardo Arruda Miranda9, Diana Rodrigues Pina10.   

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated statistical and texture analysis abilities to differentiate cancerous from healthy tissue in magnetic resonance imaging. This study developed a method based on texture analysis and machine learning to differentiate prostate findings. Forty-eight male patients with PI-RADS classification and subsequent radical prostatectomy histopathological analysis were used as gold standard. Experienced radiologists delimited the regions of interest in magnetic resonance images. Six different groups of images were used to perform multiple analyses (seven analyses variations). Those analyses were outlined by specialists in urology as those of most significant importance for the classification. Forty texture features were extracted from each image and processed with Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes. Those seven analyses variation results were described in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, F-score, precision and sensitivity. The highest AUC (93.7%) and accuracy (88.8%) were obtained when differentiating the group with both MRI and histopathology positive findings against the group with both negative MRI and histopathology. When differentiating the group with both MRI and histopathology positive findings versus the peripheral image zone group the AUC value was 86.6%. When differentiating the group with negative MRI/positive histopathology versus the group with both negative MRI and histopathology the AUC value was 80.7%. The evaluation of statistical and texture analysis promoted very suggestive indications for future work in prostate cancer suspicious regions. The method is fast for both region of interest selection and classification with machine learning and the result brings original contributions in the classification of different groups of patients. This tool is low-cost, and can be used to assist diagnostic decisions.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histopathology; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Texture analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35325377     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01118-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  21 in total

Review 1.  Texture analysis: a review of neurologic MR imaging applications.

Authors:  A Kassner; R E Thornhill
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Donald Gleason and the grading of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ross MacKenzie
Journal:  J Insur Med       Date:  2009

3.  Automated prostate cancer detection using T2-weighted and high-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Texture analyses of quantitative susceptibility maps to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from cognitive normal and mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Eo-Jin Hwang; Hyug-Gi Kim; Danbi Kim; Hak Young Rhee; Chang-Woo Ryu; Tian Liu; Yi Wang; Geon-Ho Jahng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Ileana Montoya Perez; Parisa Movahedi; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Jonne Pohjankukka; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Quantitative texture analysis of brain white matter lesions derived from T2-weighted MR images in MS patients with clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  C P Loizou; S Petroudi; I Seimenis; M Pantziaris; C S Pattichis
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.447

7.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Masoom A Haider; Anwar R Padhani; Geert Villeirs; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Daniel J Margolis; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadhna Verma; Jelle Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Automated prostate cancer detection via comprehensive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging texture feature models.

Authors:  Farzad Khalvati; Alexander Wong; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.