Literature DB >> 16735177

Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range.

Robert V Mulkern1, Agnieszka Szot Barnes, Steven J Haker, Yin P Hung, Frank J Rybicki, Stephan E Maier, Clare M C Tempany.   

Abstract

Detailed measurements of water diffusion within the prostate over an extended b-factor range were performed to assess whether the standard assumption of monoexponential signal decay is appropriate in this organ. From nine men undergoing prostate MR staging examinations at 1.5 T, a single 10-mm-thick axial slice was scanned with a line scan diffusion imaging sequence in which 14 equally spaced b factors from 5 to 3,500 s/mm(2) were sampled along three orthogonal diffusion sensitization directions in 6 min. Due to the combination of long scan time and limited volume coverage associated with the multi-b-factor, multidirectional sampling, the slice was chosen online from the available T2-weighted axial images with the specific goal of enabling the sampling of presumed noncancerous regions of interest (ROIs) within the central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ). Histology from prescan biopsy (n=9) and postsurgical resection (n=4) was subsequently employed to help confirm that the ROIs sampled were noncancerous. The CG ROIs were characterized from the T2-weighted images as primarily mixtures of glandular and stromal benign prostatic hyperplasia, which is prevalent in this population. The water signal decays with b factor from all ROIs were clearly non-monoexponential and better served with bi- vs. monoexponential fits, as tested using chi(2)-based F test analyses. Fits to biexponential decay functions yielded intersubject fast diffusion component fractions in the order of 0.73+/-0.08 for both CG and PZ ROIs, fast diffusion coefficients of 2.68+/-0.39 and 2.52+/-0.38 microm(2)/ms and slow diffusion coefficients of 0.44+/-0.16 and 0.23+/-0.16 um(2)/ms for CG and PZ ROIs, respectively. The difference between the slow diffusion coefficients within CG and PZ was statistically significant as assessed with a Mann-Whitney nonparametric test (P<.05). We conclude that a monoexponential model for water diffusion decay in prostate tissue is inadequate when a large range of b factors is sampled and that biexponential analyses are better suited for characterizing prostate diffusion decay curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735177      PMCID: PMC1880900          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  37 in total

Review 1.  Imaging prostate cancer.

Authors:  K K Yu; H Hricak
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficient parametrization in adult vs newborn brain.

Authors:  R V Mulkern; S Vajapeyam; R L Robertson; P A Caruso; M J Rivkin; S E Maier
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Improved magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Sheng-Kwei Song; Zhican Qu; Emily M Garabedian; Jeffrey I Gordon; Jeffrey Milbrandt; Joseph J H Ackerman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Normal brain and brain tumor: multicomponent apparent diffusion coefficient line scan imaging.

Authors:  S E Maier; P Bogner; G Bajzik; H Mamata; Y Mamata; I Repa; F A Jolesz; R V Mulkern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain.

Authors:  C A Clark; D Le Bihan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Water diffusion, T(2), and compartmentation in frog sciatic nerve.

Authors:  S Peled; D G Cory; S A Raymond; D A Kirschner; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Human prostate: multisection proton MR spectroscopic imaging with a single spin-echo sequence--preliminary experience.

Authors:  M van der Graaf; H J van den Boogert; G J Jager; J O Barentsz; A Heerschap
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with gleason score based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kristen L Zakian; Kanishka Sircar; Hedvig Hricak; Hui-Ni Chen; Amita Shukla-Dave; Steven Eberhardt; Manickam Muruganandham; Lanie Ebora; Michael W Kattan; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical overview and value of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  G D Grossfeld; F V Coakley
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  The prostate: MR imaging and spectroscopy. Present and future.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; R G Males; M G Swanson; K K Yu; H Hricak
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion weighted imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Jihong Wang; Vikas Kundra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Junping Wang; Qian Liao; Yunting Zhang; Chunshui Yu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  E E Sigmund; G Y Cho; S Kim; M Finn; M Moccaldi; J H Jensen; D K Sodickson; J D Goldberg; S Formenti; L Moy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Evaluation of fitting models for prostate tissue characterization using extended-range b-factor diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Fredrik Langkilde; Thiele Kobus; Andriy Fedorov; Ruth Dunne; Clare Tempany; Robert V Mulkern; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Periferic Prostate Cancer Detection and Stratification.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Francesca Patella; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Silvia Panella; Anna Maria Ierardi; Giovanni Guido Pompili; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Alberto Magenta Biasina; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Hybrid diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  MR-guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Clare Tempany; Sarah Straus; Nobuhiko Hata; Steven Haker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Accelerated Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Prostate Imaging for Higher Resolution, Higher Geometric Fidelity, and Multi-b Perfusion Estimation.

Authors:  Pelin Aksit Ciris; Jr-Yuan George Chiou; Daniel I Glazer; Tzu-Cheng Chao; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Bruno Madore; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Precise Inference and Characterization of Structural Organization (PICASO) of tissue from molecular diffusion.

Authors:  Lipeng Ning; Evren Özarslan; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Yogesh Rathi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging in the assessment of liver function: Its potential as an effective predictor of liver function.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshimaru; Yasuo Takatsu; Yuichi Suzuki; Toshiaki Miyati; Yuhki Hamada; Ayumu Funaki; Ayumi Tabata; Chifumi Maruyama; Masahiko Shimada; Maki Tobari; Takayoshi Nishino
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.