| Literature DB >> 31238393 |
Suresh K Pandey1, Vidushi Sharma1.
Abstract
Ophthalmology is a field that is now seeing the integration of robotics in its surgical procedures and interventions. Assistance facilitated by robots offers substantial improvements in terms of movement control, tremor cancellation, enhanced visualization, and distance sensing. Robotic technology has only recently been integrated into ophthalmology; hence, the progression is only in its initial stages. Robotic technologies such as da Vinci Surgical System are integrated into the field of ophthalmology and are assisting surgeons in complex eye surgeries. Ophthalmic surgeries require high accuracy and precision to execute tissue manipulation, and some complex ocular surgery may take few hours to complete the procedures that may predispose high-volume ophthalmic surgeons to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A complete paradigm shift has been achieved in this particular field through the integration of advanced robotic technology, resulting in easier and more efficient procedures. Where robotic technology assists the surgeons and improves the overall quality of care, it also projects several challenges including limited availability, training, and the high cost of the robotic system. Although considerable studies and trials have been conducted for various robotic systems, only a few of them have made it to the commercial stage and ophthalmology, on its own, has a long way to go in robotics technology.Entities:
Keywords: ZEUS Robotic Surgical System (ZRSS); da Vinci robotic system; femtosecond laser cataract devices; intraocular robotic interventional surgical system; multi-arm hybrid robotic system; robot assisted vitreoretinal surgery; robotics in ophthalmology; telerobotic technology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31238393 PMCID: PMC6611303 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1131_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1A Steady-hand Eye Robot Developed in Johns Hopkins University for Retinal Microsurgery. (Figure courtesy- Johns Hopkins University)
Figure 3Intraocular Robotic Interventional Surgical System. (Figure courtesy- Mechatronics)
Application of Robotics in Ophthalmology
| Robotics in Ophthalmology | Place and Year of Development | Functions |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Stereotaxical Micro-telemanipulator for Ocular Surgery | France, 1980s | Allows 4 degrees of rotation with translation to facilitate precise movements. |
| 2. Prototype robotic system based on the S.M.O.S. platform | Japan, 1989 | Assists in vitreoretinal surgery and increased accuracy. The prototype eliminates the interoperator variability to enhance precision. |
| 3. Steady hand manipulator for retinal microsurgery | John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 1999 | Reduces tremors, and minimizes undesirable eye wall tension. |
| 4. Multi-arm hybrid robotic system | Columbia University, USA, 2009 | Offers skillful manipulation of eye. |
| 5. Da Vinci Surgical System | The United States, approved in 2000 by FDA | Used in performing suture repair of a corneal laceration, executing complete continuous capsulorhexis on the anterior lens capsule, and to perform 3-port 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. |
| 6. Hexapod Surgical System | France, 2011 | Mounted to the da Vinci Macro Robot, this system offers a remote center of motion at the site of ocular penetration. |
| 7. Micro Hand using the micro electromechanical systems technology, (MEMS) | USA, 2010 | Offers manipulation of fresh retinal tissue and can maneuver caliper weights. It is designed in the same manner as a human hand. |
| 8. Intraocular Robotic Interventional Surgical System | Mechatronics and Control Laboratory and Stein Eye Institute, USA 2011 | It is designed to facilitate telesurgery using a stereoscopic visualization system, joystick controls, and custom designed arms. This system is equipped with tremor filtration and performs scaled motion. |
| 9. Femtosecond Laser Devices | The United States, approved by FDA in 2001 | Facilitates cataract surgery and can be used in wound construction, capsulorhexis creation, and nucleus breakdown during the cataract surgery. |
Studies Published on Robotics and Ophthalmology
| Name of Author/Year | Type of Surgery | Robotics & Ophthalmology | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Tsirbas, A., Mango, C. and Dutson, E., 2007 | Bimanual, three-dimensional robotic surgery. Ocular microsurgery was performed using da Vinci Surgical Robot. | Ocular microsurgery was performed using a da Vinci surgical robot. Repair of corneal laceration done in a porcine model. Excellent visualization was obtained during the surgery and the sutures were placed delicately at the corneal level with controlled movements. | Robotic ocular microsurgery has proven to be successful. Moreover, it can make the procedure more time-efficient. |
| 2. Smet, MD., Naus, GJL., Faridpooya, K., and Mura, M., 2018 | Presents overview of intraocular surgery, | Reviewed three robotics used in ophthalmic procedures: steady hand manipulator for retinal microsurgery, Preceyes surgical system for intraocular surgery, and da Vinci Surgical Robot for ex-vivo corneal surgery. | Several eye-specific systems have proven to be successful in different ocular surgeries, but only a few of these robotic systems have been able to make it to the commercial platform. Despite the development, robotic systems will take time to get incorporated in the surgical procedures. |
| 3. Hubschman, JP., Tsirbas, A., and Schwartz, SD., 2008 | Robotic external ocular surgery was performed using robotic arms. | Robotic arms were used to carry out a 25 gauge robotic vitrectomy. Robotic forceps were used to grasp and subsequently remove the foreign body from the anterior chamber. A 360 degree capsulorhexis was achieved through the movement of the robotic arms. | Robotic arms are not much feasible to use in ocular surgery. The visualization gets hindered and continuously requires realignment. Conversely, robotic forceps offer more ease in manipulation and control of the instruments. However, the procedure can be improved substantially through miniaturization. |
| 4. Noda Y, Ida Y, and Tanaka S., | Application of robotic instruments and system for vitreoretinal surgery | The capability of robotics application to target the fundus was analyzed in comparison to the manual procedure and performance. | Robotic assistance in approaching the target on the fundus, and to stabilize the manipulator tip above the fundus ensures more accuracy and improves the contact with the target. This has proven to be beneficial for both experienced and inexperienced hands. |
| 5. Roizenblatt M, Edwards TL, and Gehlbach PL., 2018 | Robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery | Robotic systems considerably suppress tremor during the vitreoretinal surgery and improves the coordination between the surgeon and the robot. Vitrectomy is executed with more precision by robotics when it is combined with intravenous thrombolysis. | Improved control, dexterity, diminished tremors, and micron-scale distance sensing has been achieved in vitreoretinal surgery through robotics. However, there are substantial challenges in implementation including costs, clinical risks and complications. |
| 6. Bourla DH, Hubschman JP, Culjat M, | Intraocular Robot surgery using da Vinci Surgical System. | The da Vinci Surgical System was utilized in performing different surgical procedures including 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign body removal, and anterior capsulorhexis. The aim of the study was to assess the robot's ability to offer control to the surgeon, improve dexterity and maneuverability, and enhance visualization. | The da Vinci Surgical System successfully offered complete range of movement. Steady motion with optimum dexterity was achieved. To retain excellent visualization, realignment was required. This highlights the shortcomings of da Vinci Surgical System in ocular surgeries. |