Literature DB >> 11923603

Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications.

Jacques Marescaux1, Joel Leroy, Francesco Rubino, Michelle Smith, Michel Vix, Michele Simone, Didier Mutter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To show the feasibility of performing surgery across transoceanic distances by using dedicated asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) telecommunication technology. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Technical limitations and the issue of time delay for transmission of digitized information across existing telecommunication lines had been a source of concern about the feasibility of performing a complete surgical procedure from remote distances.
METHODS: To verify the feasibility and safety in humans, the authors attempted remote robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a 68-year-old woman with a history of abdominal pain and cholelithiasis. Surgeons were in New York and the patient in Strasbourg. Connections between the sites were done with a high-speed terrestrial network (ATM service).
RESULTS: The operation was carried out successfully in 54 minutes without difficulty or complications. Despite a round-trip distance of more than 14,000 km, the mean time lag for transmission during the procedure was 155 ms. The surgeons perceived the procedure as safe and the overall system as perfectly reliable. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient returned to normal activities within 2 weeks after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote robot-assisted surgery appears feasible and safe. Teletransmission of active surgical manipulations has the potential to ensure availability of surgical expertise in remote locations for difficult or rare operations, and to improve surgical training worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923603      PMCID: PMC1422462          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation.

Authors:  M D Fabrizio; B R Lee; D Y Chan; D Stoianovici; T W Jarrett; C Yang; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Suturing and knot tying in laparoscopy.

Authors:  N J Soper; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Computer-assisted cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Carpentier; D Loulmet; B Aupecle; A Berrebi; J Relland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution.

Authors:  T M Krummel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  A Garcia-Ruiz; N G Smedira; F D Loop; J F Hahn; J H Miller; C P Steiner; M Gagner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 6.  Robots in operating theatres.

Authors:  R A Buckingham; R O Buckingham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-02

Review 7.  Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-11

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men.

Authors:  G Pasticier; J B Rietbergen; B Guillonneau; G Fromont; M Menon; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Development of robotic enhanced endoscopic surgery for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  U Kappert; J Schneider; R Cichon; V Gulielmos; S M Tugtekin; J Nicolai; K Matschke; S Schueler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; O Germay; R Izizaw; M Degueldre; J Vandromme; E Capelluto; J Bruyns
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  52 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Interdisciplinary surgery and telemedicine].

Authors:  P M Schlag; M Hünerbein; C Ulmer; G Graschew
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Robotic surgery update.

Authors:  G Jacobsen; F Elli; S Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robotics in pediatric surgery: perspectives for imaging.

Authors:  Adrien J Kant; Michael D Klein; Scott E Langenburg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-02-18

6.  Establishment of the world's first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community.

Authors:  Mehran Anvari; Craig McKinley; Harvey Stein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

8.  Robotic ocular surgery.

Authors:  A Tsirbas; C Mango; E Dutson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Robotic surgery for oropharynx cancer: promise, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  John R de Almeida; Eric M Genden
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Equipment and technology in surgical robotics.

Authors:  Hong Gee Sim; Sidney Kam Hung Yip; Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.