Literature DB >> 12008761

Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Jelle P Ruurda1, Ivo A M J Broeders, Rogier P M Simmermacher, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, Theo J M V Van Vroonhoven.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery offers patients distinct benefits but is not without its disadvantages to surgeons in terms of maneuverability and visualization. Robotic telemanipulation systems were introduced with the objective of providing a solution to the problems in this field of surgery. The feasibility of robot-assisted surgery was assessed by performing 35 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci robotic system. Time necessary for system setup and operation was recorded, as were complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Thirty-four of 35 cholecystectomy procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci system. Technical problems occurred in three cases, resulting in one intraoperative complication (a minilaparotomy caused by the loss of an instrument part). Median hospitalization was 2 days. There were no postoperative deaths or morbidity within 30 days after surgery. System setup time decreased as the experience of the operating team increased. Operating times were comparable with those reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12008761     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  26 in total

1.  Robot-assisted choledochotomy: feasibility.

Authors:  G Roeyen; T Chapelle; D Ysebaert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders; B Pulles; F M Kappelhof; C van der Werken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinical characteristics of remote Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 40 cases.

Authors:  Han-Xin Zhou; Yue-Hua Guo; Xiao-Fang Yu; Shi-Yun Bao; Jia-Lin Liu; Yue Zhang; Yong-Gong Ren; Qun Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Diks; J E N Jaspers; W Wisselink; B A M J de Mol; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic ocular surgery.

Authors:  A Tsirbas; C Mango; E Dutson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Guido Woeste; W O Bechstein; C Wullstein
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Ward Davies; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.

Authors:  Carlo C Passerotti; Felipe Franco; Julio C C Bissoli; Bruno Tiseo; Caio M Oliveira; Carlos A O Buchalla; Gustavo N C Inoue; Arzu Sencan; Aydin Sencan; Rogerio Ruscitto do Pardo; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyu-Seog Choi; In Ja Park; Byung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.