Literature DB >> 8934123

Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology.

M G Hunink1.   

Abstract

The decision to implement a new medical technology requires that it not only increases survival or quality of life, but that it is also economically sound. The unique feature in the assessment of diagnostic tests is that the results of such tests are intermediate outcomes. Both randomized controlled clinical trials and decision analysis have an important role to play in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Important points to consider when performing a cost-effectiveness study are what perspective to take; comparing the technology with the next best strategy; including both effectiveness and costs; the distinction between describing and valuing the quality of life; intangibles such as the value of information; and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934123     DOI: 10.1007/bf00187659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten; B M van Ineveld; L van Roijen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; B M van Ineveld
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Optimal management of suspected lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis. An evaluation with cost assessment of 24 management strategies.

Authors:  B E Hillner; J T Philbrick; D M Becker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-01

4.  Costs and benefits of low-osmolality contrast agents in radiology.

Authors:  J B Sutherland; W Huda
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 5.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Economic and cost-effectiveness investigations of radiologic practices.

Authors:  N R Powe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Meta-analysis of failure-time data with adjustment for covariates.

Authors:  M G Hunink; J B Wong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; C Mooney; V Grow; C E Phelps
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-01

9.  Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.

Authors:  N R Powe; E P Steinberg; J E Erickson; R D Moore; C R Smith; R I White; J A Brinker; E K Fishman; S J Zinreich; M L Kinnison
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.

Authors:  E P Steinberg; R D Moore; N R Powe; R Gopalan; A J Davidoff; M Litt; S Graziano; J A Brinker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Controlling instruments in radiology].

Authors:  M Maurer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.