Literature DB >> 31235601

Cochlear partition anatomy and motion in humans differ from the classic view of mammals.

Stefan Raufer1,2, John J Guinan3,2,4, Hideko Heidi Nakajima3,2,4.   

Abstract

Mammals detect sound through mechanosensitive cells of the cochlear organ of Corti that rest on the basilar membrane (BM). Motions of the BM and organ of Corti have been studied at the cochlear base in various laboratory animals, and the assumption has been that the cochleas of all mammals work similarly. In the classic view, the BM attaches to a stationary osseous spiral lamina (OSL), the tectorial membrane (TM) attaches to the limbus above the stationary OSL, and the BM is the major moving element, with a peak displacement near its center. Here, we measured the motion and studied the anatomy of the human cochlear partition (CP) at the cochlear base of fresh human cadaveric specimens. Unlike the classic view, we identified a soft-tissue structure between the BM and OSL in humans, which we name the CP "bridge." We measured CP transverse motion in humans and found that the OSL moved like a plate hinged near the modiolus, with motion increasing from the modiolus to the bridge. The bridge moved almost as much as the BM, with the maximum CP motion near the bridge-BM connection. BM motion accounts for 100% of CP volume displacement in the classic view, but accounts for only 27 to 43% in the base of humans. In humans, the TM-limbus attachment is above the moving bridge, not above a fixed structure. These results challenge long-held assumptions about cochlear mechanics in humans. In addition, animal apical anatomy (in SI Appendix) doesn't always fit the classic view.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basilar membrane; cochlea; hearing; inner ear; tuning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31235601      PMCID: PMC6628837          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900787116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  39 in total

1.  The "inverse problem" solved for a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. III. Brushing-up the solution method.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  K E Nilsen; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  W S Rhode; A Recio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Wave propagation patterns in a "classical" three-dimensional model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Nanomechanics of the subtectorial space caused by electromechanics of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  Manuela Nowotny; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Sunil Puria; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  7 in total

1.  Anatomy of the Human Osseous Spiral Lamina and Cochlear Partition Bridge: Relevance for Cochlear Partition Motion.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Cornelia Idoff; Aleksandrs Zosuls; Giacomo Marino; Nathan Blanke; Irving J Bigio; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Joseph B Nadol; John J Guinan; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

2.  Inner hair cell stereocilia are embedded in the tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Pierre Hakizimana; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Experimental Validation of a Three-Dimensional Heat Transfer Model Within the Scala Tympani With Application to Magnetic Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Fateme Esmailie; Mathieu Francoeur; Tim Ameel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.756

4.  Cochlear shape reveals that the human organ of hearing is sex-typed from birth.

Authors:  J Braga; C Samir; L Risser; J Dumoncel; D Descouens; J F Thackeray; P Balaresque; A Oettlé; J-M Loubes; A Fradi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Correlation of a 2D Volume-Referencing Endolymphatic-Hydrops Grading System With Extra-Tympanic Electrocochleography in Patients With Definite Ménière's Disease.

Authors:  Baihui He; Fan Zhang; Hui Zheng; Xiayu Sun; Junmin Chen; Jianyong Chen; Yupeng Liu; Lu Wang; Wei Wang; Shuna Li; Jun Yang; Maoli Duan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Robust Data-Driven Auditory Profiling Towards Precision Audiology.

Authors:  Raul Sanchez-Lopez; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.672

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.