Literature DB >> 17943013

Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf.

Anne-Lise Giraud1, Hyo-Jeong Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cochlear implantation is an effective technique for restoring hearing in the profoundly deaf. Although cochlear implants are a therapeutical success, huge performance variability in speech comprehension is observed after implantation. The reason for this remains incompletely understood after 20 years of clinical practice and basic research. Which patients are going to respond well and why is an unresolved question. The duration of auditory deprivation plays an important role, and currently is the main predictor of implantation success in children; basically, the earlier the better. However, among patients with identical duration of deafness, performance remains highly variable, suggesting there are other more fundamental factors that determine clinical outcome.
METHODS: To delineate the cognitive factors that could influence the clinical outcome of cochlear implantation, we correlated resting metabolism PET images acquired before implantation in congenitally deaf children with speech perception behavioural scores measured three years after implantation.
RESULTS: Using this paradigm, we showed distinct brain organisation patterns in the deaf brain, which predict good and bad speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation.
CONCLUSION: These data show that brain organisation assessed immediately before cochlear implantation can efficiently predict subsequent speech outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  43 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The effect of cochlear-implant-mediated electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cells in congenitally deaf white cats.

Authors:  Iris Chen; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-04

4.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neurocognitive risk in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Jessica Beer; Irina Castellanos; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  The role of the salience network in processing lexical and nonlexical stimuli in cochlear implant users: an ALE meta-analysis of PET studies.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Sven Vanneste; Diane S Lazard; Paul Van de Heyning; Joo Hyun Park; Seung Ha Oh; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Towards a Complete In Silico Assessment of the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  Nerea Mangado; Mario Ceresa; Heval Benav; Pavel Mistrik; Gemma Piella; Miguel A González Ballester
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 8.  Cochlear implants matching the prosthesis to the brain and facilitating desired plastic changes in brain function.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman; Marty G Woldorff; Debara L Tucci
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Donna Thal; John K Niparko; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.