Benjamin W Botsford1, Andrew M Williams1, Ian P Conner1, Joseph N Martel1, Andrew W Eller2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: elleraw@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report refractive outcomes of scleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with Gore-Tex (W.L. Gore & Associates, Newark, DE) suture and combined pars plana vitrectomy and compare predicted refractive outcomes among 5 IOL power calculation formulas. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing scleral-fixated IOL implantation with Gore-Tex suture at our institution between January 2015 and June 2018. METHODS: Comparison of preoperative biometrics with postoperative refraction and calculation of predicted refractive outcome with 5 different IOL formulas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction error and absolute error to compare postoperative refraction with refraction predicted by lens power calculation formulas. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients were included. All power calculations assumed in-the-bag position of the IOL. The Akreos A060 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) was implanted in 23 eyes and the CZ70BD (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) in 8 eyes, and all lenses were sutured 3 mm behind the limbus. Average postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.79±0.95 diopters (D). Average prediction error (postoperative SE refraction minus target refraction) was -0.19±0.72 D. Postoperative SE was within 1.0 D of target in 25 of 31 patients (81%) and 2.0 D of target in 31 of 31 patients (100%). The repeated-measures analysis of variance of absolute error by lens power formula was significant (P = 0.012), with Haigis demonstrating greater error. There was no significant difference among Barrett II, Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff theoretical (SRK/T), Holladay 2, or Hoffer Q. CONCLUSIONS: For eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with scleral-sutured IOL implantation, assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating lens power leads to acceptable refractive outcomes. Barrett II, SRK/T, Holladay 2, and Hoffer Q formulas were noninferior to each other.
PURPOSE: To report refractive outcomes of scleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with Gore-Tex (W.L. Gore & Associates, Newark, DE) suture and combined pars plana vitrectomy and compare predicted refractive outcomes among 5 IOL power calculation formulas. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing scleral-fixated IOL implantation with Gore-Tex suture at our institution between January 2015 and June 2018. METHODS: Comparison of preoperative biometrics with postoperative refraction and calculation of predicted refractive outcome with 5 different IOL formulas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction error and absolute error to compare postoperative refraction with refraction predicted by lens power calculation formulas. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients were included. All power calculations assumed in-the-bag position of the IOL. The Akreos A060 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) was implanted in 23 eyes and the CZ70BD (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) in 8 eyes, and all lenses were sutured 3 mm behind the limbus. Average postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.79±0.95 diopters (D). Average prediction error (postoperative SE refraction minus target refraction) was -0.19±0.72 D. Postoperative SE was within 1.0 D of target in 25 of 31 patients (81%) and 2.0 D of target in 31 of 31 patients (100%). The repeated-measures analysis of variance of absolute error by lens power formula was significant (P = 0.012), with Haigis demonstrating greater error. There was no significant difference among Barrett II, Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff theoretical (SRK/T), Holladay 2, or Hoffer Q. CONCLUSIONS: For eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with scleral-sutured IOL implantation, assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating lens power leads to acceptable refractive outcomes. Barrett II, SRK/T, Holladay 2, and Hoffer Q formulas were noninferior to each other.
Authors: Michael D Wagoner; Terry A Cox; Reginald George Ariyasu; Deborah S Jacobs; Carol L Karp Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Bozho Todorich; Maxwell S Stem; Keshav Kooragayala; Aristomenis Thanos; Lisa J Faia; George A Williams; Tarek S Hassan; Maria A Woodward; Jeremy D Wolfe Journal: Retina Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Yesha S Shah; Angela Y Zhu; Sidra I Zafar; Daniel Sarezky; Ximin Li; T Y Alvin Liu; Mira M Sachdeva; Fasika A Woreta Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: Nimesh A Patel; Kenneth C Fan; Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Jorge A Fortun; Luis J Haddock; Sonia H Yoo; Patrice J Persad; Elizabeth A Vanner; Sarah P Read; Basil K Williams; Jayanth Sridhar; Thomas A Albini; Harry W Flynn; Kendall Donaldson; Justin H Townsend Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2020-12-21