Wenlong Wei1, Haishuang Lin2, Xuanli Zheng2, Siyi Wang1, Shengsheng Bai1, Zhenquan Zhao3. 1. The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China. 2. Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China. 3. The Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China. zzquan2004@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus in post-traumatic eyes using SRK/T formula. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included 35 eyes from 35 post-traumatic patients undergoing scleral-suture of ErgomaX IOLs by a single experienced surgeon. Preoperative predicted refraction, procedure-related complications, and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at least 1 month after surgery were recorded. The prediction error (PE) was calculated as the difference between the postoperative SE and preoperative predicted refraction. RESULTS: Of the 35 post-traumatic patients, 28 patients were aphakia without capsular support, and 7 patients were traumatic lens dislocation or subluxation. The mean age at surgery was 56.03 ± 14.56 years and 28 patients were men (80%). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and postoperative astigmatism were - 1.23 ± 0.82 D and 1.57 ± 1.14 D, respectively. The mean prediction error (ME) of SRK/T formula was - 0.17 D. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.48D. The prediction accuracy was 60.0% for refractive errors of ± 0.50 D and 85.7% for refractive errors of ± 1.00D. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that IOL power has positive correlation with PE. CONCLUSION: Assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating IOL (52501TY, ErgomaX) power for standardizing scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus demonstrates acceptable refractive outcomes. The accuracy of IOL power calculation using the SRK/T formula for eyes needing low IOL power or high IOL power may be affected by the uncertain position of postoperative IOL and further studies are needed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus in post-traumatic eyes using SRK/T formula. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included 35 eyes from 35 post-traumatic patients undergoing scleral-suture of ErgomaX IOLs by a single experienced surgeon. Preoperative predicted refraction, procedure-related complications, and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at least 1 month after surgery were recorded. The prediction error (PE) was calculated as the difference between the postoperative SE and preoperative predicted refraction. RESULTS: Of the 35 post-traumatic patients, 28 patients were aphakia without capsular support, and 7 patients were traumatic lens dislocation or subluxation. The mean age at surgery was 56.03 ± 14.56 years and 28 patients were men (80%). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and postoperative astigmatism were - 1.23 ± 0.82 D and 1.57 ± 1.14 D, respectively. The mean prediction error (ME) of SRK/T formula was - 0.17 D. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.48D. The prediction accuracy was 60.0% for refractive errors of ± 0.50 D and 85.7% for refractive errors of ± 1.00D. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that IOL power has positive correlation with PE. CONCLUSION: Assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating IOL (52501TY, ErgomaX) power for standardizing scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus demonstrates acceptable refractive outcomes. The accuracy of IOL power calculation using the SRK/T formula for eyes needing low IOL power or high IOL power may be affected by the uncertain position of postoperative IOL and further studies are needed.
Authors: Maria Montserrat Bausili Portabella; Jeroni Nadal; Juan Alvarez de Toledo; María Fideliz de la Paz; Rafael Ignacio Barraquer Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Ali Tabatabaei; Mohammad Yaser Kiarudi; Fariba Ghassemi; Sasan Moghimi; Mohammadreza Mansouri; Ahmad Mirshahi; Ahmad Kheirkhah Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-08-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Daniel Su; John D Stephens; Anthony Obeid; Durga Borkar; Philip P Storey; M Ali Khan; Jason Hsu; Sunir J Garg; Omesh Gupta Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-03-02
Authors: John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Charles W Feagan; Wesley L Crouse; Sundar Shrestha; Alex R Kemper; Thomas J Hoerger; Jinan B Saaddine Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 12.079