Literature DB >> 15532658

Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects.

Hongbin Chen1, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Frequency modulation (FM) detection was investigated in acoustic and electric hearing to characterize cochlear-implant subjects' ability to detect dynamic frequency changes and to assess the relative contributions of temporal and spectral cues to frequency processing. Difference limens were measured for frequency upward sweeps, downward sweeps, and sinusoidal FM as a function of standard frequency and modulation rate. In electric hearing, factors including electrode position and stimulation level were also studied. Electric hearing data showed that the difference limen increased monotonically as a function of standard frequency regardless of the modulation type, the modulation rate, the electrode position, and the stimulation level. In contrast, acoustic hearing data showed that the difference limen was nearly a constant as a function of standard frequency. This difference was interpreted to mean that temporal cues are used only at low standard frequencies and at low modulation rates. At higher standard frequencies and modulation rates, the reliance on the place cue is increased, accounting for the better performance in acoustic hearing than for electric hearing with single-electrode stimulation. The present data suggest a speech processing strategy that encodes slow frequency changes using lower stimulation rates than those typically employed by contemporary cochlear-implant speech processors.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15532658     DOI: 10.1121/1.1785833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  FM-selective networks in human auditory cortex revealed using fMRI and multivariate pattern classification.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Paul Fillmore; Feng Rong; Gregory Hickok; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joshua S Stohl; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Min-Yu Cheng; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  The role of cochlear place coding in the perception of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.