Literature DB >> 15811699

Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.

Qian-Jie Fu1.   

Abstract

In cochlear implant speech processor design, acoustic amplitudes are mapped to electric currents with the intention of preserving loudness relationships across electrodes. Many parameters may affect the growth of loudness with electrical stimulation. The present study measured the effects of stimulation rate and electrode configuration on loudness growth in six Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Loudness balance functions were measured for stimuli that differed in terms of stimulation rate, electrode configuration and electrode location; a 2-alternative, forced-choice adaptive procedure (double-staircase) was used. First, subjects adaptively adjusted the amplitude of a 100-pulse-per-second (pps) pulse train to match the loudness of a 1000-pps standard pulse train. For a range of reference stimulation levels, the loudness of the 100-pps stimulus was matched to that of the 1000-pps standard stimulus; loudness balancing was performed for three electrode pairs [(20,22), (1,3), (1,22)]. The results showed that the loudness balance functions between the 100- and 1000-pps stimulation rates were highly subject-dependent. Some subjects' loudness balance functions were logarithmic, while others' were nearly linear. Loudness balance functions were also measured across electrode locations [(20,22) vs. (1,3)] for two stimulation rates (100, 1000 pps). Results showed that the loudness balance functions between the apical and basal electrode pairs highly depended on the stimulation rate. For all subjects, at the 1000-pps rate, the loudness balance functions between the two electrode locations were nearly linear; however, at the 100-pps rate, the loudness balance function was highly nonlinear in two out of six subjects. These results suggest that, for some cochlear implant patients, low-frequency stimulation may be processed differently at different electrode locations; for these patients, acoustic-to-electric amplitude mapping may need to be sensitive to this place-dependent processing when relatively low stimulation rates are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811699     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Tiffany Elise H Chua; Mark Bachman; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirby; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Christine Etler; Sara O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation.

Authors:  Ziyan Zhu; Qing Tang; Fan-Gang Zeng; Tian Guan; Datian Ye
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.